AS SSD Benchmark - Post your results. - Page 10

doodz · 19th September 2010, 10:24 AM

Intel X25-m 80GB on Asus UL30VT Laptop:

straiton · 19th September 2010, 4:08 PM

Precurser,
read up a little,using Diskpar to align the disk.Some mentioned using 64 for the alignment or 1024.Tried 64, didn't work, as above.
http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/fo...isk#post325221

Plus I'm not really up with all this stuff.
Next stop 1024.

PreCurser · 19th September 2010, 5:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by straiton

..Next stop 1024.

Now ye talkin!

This was the number, and i think multiples of it would also work if there was any reason* to do so.
After some scrolling down in the page i linked earlier i could see the XP walkthrough, and you seem on the right track.
Don't forget to ditch the IDE/compatible mode if possible

GDavid · 20th September 2010, 1:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brocke8

Gigabyte X58 UD-7
Intel 930
Intel 9.6 AHCI Driver
2 x G.Skill Phoenix 120GB SSD's

image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Yeah baby! Nice... You must see some lightning fast load times surely?

I remember reading somewhere here that TRIM had been enabled in RAID, are you seeing the trim get through brocke8?

Regards,
Dave

straiton · 28th September 2010, 11:00 PM

realigned disk at 128 sectors,edited in above post.
Almost no difference.
Precurser,there is no AHCI option in the bios.Must be time to upgrade

PreCurser · 29th September 2010, 8:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GDavid

I remember reading somewhere here that TRIM had been enabled in RAID..

Recent thread by paul881. And some results here.

Quote:

Originally Posted by straiton

realigned disk at 128 sectors..

Did you try the exact method below? Taken from another thread (in turn taken from OCZ wiki), partition alignment of OCZ SSD for XP:
> Insert Win7/Vista 32bit recovery disc (download one here)
> Boot from CD
> Select language
> Select Use recovery tools that can..
> Command Prompt
> diskpart
> list disk
> select disk X
> clean
> create partition primary align=1024
> active
> format fs=ntfs label="eg_SystemDrive" quick
> Exit

Quote:

Originally Posted by straiton

..there is no AHCI option in the bios..

You need to track down and quiz someone with a similar board to get a more accurate description of which option you're looking for, to be certain.

GDavid · 29th September 2010, 10:29 PM

Thanks PreCurser, read the thread and looks to be quite good even though it doesn't state that the trim makes it through the to the array...

TRIM supported as long as drives NOT part of array...

tomartomau · 3rd October 2010, 10:48 PM

I have an older X300 with s Samsung MLC Hard Drive, the previous owner took the original SLC out saying that he was willing to provide me with a new SSD, however this one is MLC, knowing what I know now I would have kept the 'old' SLC that came with the laptop originally.

This is the MMCRE 64G8MXP-OVB

I was considering getting an Intel 2nd Generation 1.8" SSD as the OCZ Vertex Sandforce 1.8" are hard to get (or I have not been able to find one for sale).

Would the age of my machine (Intel Core 2 Duo processor LV7100 (1.2 GHz), 4-MB L2 cache, 800 MHz Source-Synchronous Front Side Bus) work against a newer SSD?

This is taking ages, like 32 minutes and it has not finished the second teir of tests (4K). I will run the program overnight and post further results tomorrow.
Seq 116.34 43.17
4K 0.39

VTi-RT · 5th October 2010, 11:00 AM

My drives.

My 4k read seems to be lower than some of you guys.

C: - Vertex2 120G
D: - Vertex2 120G
E: - 3x Intel x25e 32G Raid 0
F: - 2x Vertex2 120G Raid 0
G: - 16gig DDR3 Ram Drive

tomartomau · 5th October 2010, 1:48 PM

Here are my Results.
AS SSD Benchmark 1.5.3784.37609
------------------------------
Name: SAMSUNG MMCRE64G8MXP-0VB
Firmware: VBM1
Controller: iaStor
Offset: 103424 K - OK
Size: 59.62 GB
Date: 5/10/2010 12:35:42 PM
------------------------------
Sequential:
------------------------------
Read: 87.17 MB/s
Write: 63.86 MB/s
------------------------------
4K:
------------------------------
Read: 12.52 MB/s
Write: 0.28 MB/s
------------------------------
4K-64Threads:
------------------------------
Read: 15.46 MB/s
Write: 0.32 MB/s
------------------------------
Access Times:
------------------------------
Read: 0.363 ms
Write: 11.346 ms
------------------------------
Score:
------------------------------
Read: 37
Write: 7
Total: 67
------------------------------

Dr. Zoidberg · 21st November 2010, 9:22 PM

This is my result. From what I have read it's woeful.

The ICH10R on my mobo never detects drives so I am using those purple Jmicron SATA ports.

Would that be my issue?

GDavid · 22nd November 2010, 2:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Zoidberg

This is my result. From what I have read it's woeful.

The ICH10R on my mobo never detects drives so I am using those purple Jmicron SATA ports.

Would that be my issue?image

What are you're system specs (as in OS/chipset)?
There's not much detail to consider atm...

You haven't filled the drive with data have you?

GDavid · 22nd November 2010, 2:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VTi-RT

My drives.

My 4k read seems to be lower than some of you guys.

C: - Vertex2 120G
D: - Vertex2 120G
E: - 3x Intel x25e 32G Raid 0
F: - 2x Vertex2 120G Raid 0
G: - 16gig DDR3 Ram Driveimage

NICE.
Like the RAM drive

Dr. Zoidberg · 22nd November 2010, 9:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GDavid

What are you're system specs (as in OS/chipset)?
There's not much detail to consider atm...

You haven't filled the drive with data have you?

sorry, I'm running an EP45-UD3R with an E7200 and Win 7 64bit.

I have now but these readings were done on a fresh install.

My previous install was poorly aligned but it made no difference.

GDavid · 23rd November 2010, 6:53 AM

Remember reading the port can make a sustantial difference, are you plugged into the first port?
Suggest you have a look around the OCZ forums, it has info based on experience and testing. Would think they will have you on your way pretty quickfast...

19th September 2010, 10:24 AM	#136
doodz Member Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Sydney Posts: 5,014	Intel X25-m 80GB on Asus UL30VT Laptop: Click to view full size! __________________ KEEP LEFT!! \| My Japan 2008 Blog \| Greatest Dead RAM Thread \| My R35 GTR Build Blog My EOC Folding Stats Norco 4220 20 HDD - 28.4TB raidz2 ZFS Server

19th September 2010, 4:08 PM	#137
straiton Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Adelaide Posts: 344	Precurser, read up a little,using Diskpar to align the disk.Some mentioned using 64 for the alignment or 1024.Tried 64, didn't work, as above. http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/fo...isk#post325221 Plus I'm not really up with all this stuff. Next stop 1024. __________________ MSI Z87 G45, delid 4770K DIY Watercool Last edited by straiton; 19th September 2010 at 4:11 PM.

28th September 2010, 11:00 PM	#140
straiton Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Adelaide Posts: 344	realigned disk at 128 sectors,edited in above post. Almost no difference. Precurser,there is no AHCI option in the bios.Must be time to upgrade __________________ MSI Z87 G45, delid 4770K DIY Watercool

3rd October 2010, 10:48 PM	#143
tomartomau Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 192	I have an older X300 with s Samsung MLC Hard Drive, the previous owner took the original SLC out saying that he was willing to provide me with a new SSD, however this one is MLC, knowing what I know now I would have kept the 'old' SLC that came with the laptop originally. This is the MMCRE 64G8MXP-OVB I was considering getting an Intel 2nd Generation 1.8" SSD as the OCZ Vertex Sandforce 1.8" are hard to get (or I have not been able to find one for sale). Would the age of my machine (Intel Core 2 Duo processor LV7100 (1.2 GHz), 4-MB L2 cache, 800 MHz Source-Synchronous Front Side Bus) work against a newer SSD? This is taking ages, like 32 minutes and it has not finished the second teir of tests (4K). I will run the program overnight and post further results tomorrow. Seq 116.34 43.17 4K 0.39 __________________ (Caveat) I acknowledge that I have resentment issues, It's just that I don't yet have a solution. Lenovo X300 Phone: Garmin A10

5th October 2010, 1:48 PM	#145
tomartomau Member Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 192	Here are my Results. AS SSD Benchmark 1.5.3784.37609 ------------------------------ Name: SAMSUNG MMCRE64G8MXP-0VB Firmware: VBM1 Controller: iaStor Offset: 103424 K - OK Size: 59.62 GB Date: 5/10/2010 12:35:42 PM ------------------------------ Sequential: ------------------------------ Read: 87.17 MB/s Write: 63.86 MB/s ------------------------------ 4K: ------------------------------ Read: 12.52 MB/s Write: 0.28 MB/s ------------------------------ 4K-64Threads: ------------------------------ Read: 15.46 MB/s Write: 0.32 MB/s ------------------------------ Access Times: ------------------------------ Read: 0.363 ms Write: 11.346 ms ------------------------------ Score: ------------------------------ Read: 37 Write: 7 Total: 67 ------------------------------ __________________ (Caveat) I acknowledge that I have resentment issues, It's just that I don't yet have a solution. Lenovo X300 Phone: Garmin A10

5th October 2010, 11:00 AM	#144
VTi-RT Member Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Melbourne Posts: 781	My drives. My 4k read seems to be lower than some of you guys. C: - Vertex2 120G D: - Vertex2 120G E: - 3x Intel x25e 32G Raid 0 F: - 2x Vertex2 120G Raid 0 G: - 16gig DDR3 Ram Drive

21st November 2010, 9:22 PM	#146
Dr. Zoidberg Member Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: Failor Park, Sydney Posts: 169	This is my result. From what I have read it's woeful. The ICH10R on my mobo never detects drives so I am using those purple Jmicron SATA ports. Would that be my issue?