![]() |
![]() OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! Search our forums with Google: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia, Sydney, NtRyde
Posts: 474
|
Guys,
I've got two division from two physical floor needing to merge for print/file sharing. Problem is one network is a 192.168.1.x while the other one is a 10.3.8.x network. My thought is change the 10.3.8.x into a 192.168.1.x with 2 AD integrated serving IP for that AD group only, has anyone done this? and what potential disaster could there be with such a radical change as essentially we need both systems to talk to each other for file & print sharing. Without putting a layer 3 switch, can anyone suggest the best approach. cheers |
|
|
|
| Join OCAU to remove this ad! |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: 3172
Posts: 287
|
Just a suggestion, Put a second nic in the server ad run the second subnet through it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia, Sydney, NtRyde
Posts: 474
|
cant do that, all PCs need to communicate to 4 servers & all printers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 332
|
Are your printers Published in AD?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia, Sydney, NtRyde
Posts: 474
|
yeap, all printers are under win2003 AD. Setting up trusts for the two AD isnt the issue. Its the 2 DHCP server on the same subnet. maybe setup 2 different scope say 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.150 for one DHCP AD & 192.168.151 - 192.168.1.254 for one DHCP AD.
Will this work? or PC will have leasing/renewing addressing problem, especially with DNS registration as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisbane (nth), Australia
Posts: 6,304
|
Quote:
__________________
_,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_ WTB: Cisco 1801-M PM me Please rehash my posts and pass them off as your own ideas! Triple points for doing it in the same page of the thread. Plagiarism is the sincerest form of copyright infringement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bathurst, NSW
Posts: 6,856
|
You should consider looking into Trusts...
__________________
Intel i7-3770k @ stock | Asus P8Z77 WS | 32GB Corsair Vengeance 1866 10-11-10-30 | 2x EVGA GTX670 SLI FTW @ stock | 1x Dell U3011 | OCZ Revodrive3 X2 MAXIOPS 480GB | Western Digital 2TB Caviar Black | Asus Essence STX | Audio-Technica ATH-AD900 | Antec HCP-1200 | Enermax Fulmo GT Midtower | Synology DS2411+ NAS | 12x Seagate 2TB 7200.12 i'm in your noun, verbing your related noun. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,066
|
1 dhcp, 1 dns
dns forwarder to the other server done or you can force dns via gpo too |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisbane (nth), Australia
Posts: 6,304
|
If it's purely file/print sharing this might be OK. Where are the exchange servers though? One per 'floor'? If so you probably won't get away without a domain trust. Various MS techs worm their way into MS and while I haven't tried it, I'd say most of them aren't crazy about having to update a foreign, non trusted AD-DNS.
__________________
_,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_ WTB: Cisco 1801-M PM me Please rehash my posts and pass them off as your own ideas! Triple points for doing it in the same page of the thread. Plagiarism is the sincerest form of copyright infringement. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Perth
Posts: 185
|
It sounds like you just need to route the subnets properly?
What are you using for default the gateway on each subnet? If it's a windows server then just add an IP in the other networks range and setup the correct routes. If it's an all-in-one ADSL modem router, then you might not be so lucky (although some can still do this type of thing).
__________________
http://www.outofgear.com/ocau/quote.png My Rig: Core I7 920 | Asus P6T-Deluxe | 6GB (3 x 2GB) 1600Mhz Corsair Dominator | ASUS GTX260 | Pioneer DVR-216 | 2 x 147G Cheetah 15K SAS (OS/APPS - RAID 0) | 5 x WD Black 1TB (DATA - RAID 5) | Antec Nine Hundred TWO | Antec True Power Quattro 850W | Samsung 2443BW 24" 1080p | Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 233
|
Quote:
It's a broadcast, so you will have to segment/bridge the networks somehow. Classes, or mac address ranges MIGHT work, but maintaining that would be harder than a spreadsheet with statics.. Every solution has it's pro's & con's.. Dual NICS.. multi homed windows DC's can get "grumpy" sometimes, VLAN's might be the best solution and switches are not too pricy... (heck) even my billion ADSL modem has them! If one network is happy to piggy back out of the "bigger" network you could "bridge" the network using something like monowall. Otherwise you could look into http://www.vyatta.com/ Yak. Last edited by Yak; 1st December 2010 at 7:45 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 259
|
Are you really keen to keep your ip addresses? Just give them a larger network, it will save you headaches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Caboolture, BNE QLD
Posts: 7,935
|
Quote:
What you don't need is duplication of users, settings and permissions. its messy for supporting and annoy users. FOR EXAMPLE the QLD Gov department of environment and resource management has this setup In the month when I was working for derm (My contract end) you'd have two domains like the original poster. Because the department had merged with together with another government department the IT boffins didn't want to change anything immediately and would slowly migrate user away from one 'weaker' domain to a single domain. However IT boffins are scared they will break shit for some users would heavily rely on the old weaker domain being faced out. Seems like this domain won't die cause the dumb boffins are AD nubs I reckon
__________________
Comments about other people's English Report poor post directly to the poster via PM (Never an admin). Please be helpful by including your advice and comments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Australia, Sydney, NtRyde
Posts: 474
|
Been thinking into the problem, having two dhcp, dns is too much headache to support.
One of the AD domain only has 30 PCs connected, so we are considering removing AD and add it to the main one as member servers. There will be some work on the server with migrating users, printers, permissions. Clients in terms of desktop profile, printers, etc We dont have exchange server so removing AD will be easier as well, long term is better supporting one AD than two. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|