Overclockers Australia Forums

OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors  

Go Back   Overclockers Australia Forums > Specific Hardware Topics > Business & Enterprise Computing

Notices


Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!
Search our forums with Google:
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19th May 2017, 2:51 PM   #23311
martini.txt
Member
 
martini.txt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: YouTube / Brisbane
Posts: 3,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by elvis View Post
I unno, lots of threads lately with folks chewing the fat about O365 vs GSuite. Folks are starting to catch on.

Speaking for myself and just pure propeller-head lulz, I want a Blackphone and ProtonMail to play with.
I'm currently migrating the business I work for from exch2010 (vm's ahoy etc...) to 365. Very slow process while they umm and ahh about giving me money to buy licenses. I've had the hybrid end configured for months now, got 5% of our mailboxes sitting there... grr, red tape, grumble grumble
__________________
YouTube twitch.tv
Rig - 6700k - Maelstrom 240 - ROG Gene VIII - STRIX 1080 - 16gb DDR4 - TT Core P3
Boop - ATH-A700X - Yeti Blackout
Micro - HP N40L w/ Ubuntu, Sickrage, Plex, Deluge
Garage - Honda Hornet 900 & Fiesta ST & BF XR6 Turbo
martini.txt is offline   Reply With Quote

Join OCAU to remove this ad!
Old 19th May 2017, 3:35 PM   #23312
NSanity
Member
 
NSanity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canberra
Posts: 15,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bcann View Post
funnily enough when i last did pretty much this on exchange 2013 just before christmas it broke outbound send for a few minutes until it worked it out itself. and by broke i mean sat in the queue until it worked it out. And i was being generous saying 5 minutes.
That would be the shadow queue on the send connector. Mail isn't lost - outbound mail will be delayed, but Mail isn't supposed to be instant externally anyway.

Quote:
Originally Posted by martini.txt View Post
I'm currently migrating the business I work for from exch2010 (vm's ahoy etc...) to 365. Very slow process while they umm and ahh about giving me money to buy licenses. I've had the hybrid end configured for months now, got 5% of our mailboxes sitting there... grr, red tape, grumble grumble
Honestly, If you're going to 365 and you have no need for Exchange on-prem - don't even bother w/ Hybrid, just use skykick/migrationwiz and sip pina colada's with Dre.

Get handy w/ PS though - because you lose the ability to manage shit "teh oldfashioned way".

Last edited by NSanity; 19th May 2017 at 3:38 PM.
NSanity is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 3:47 PM   #23313
martini.txt
Member
 
martini.txt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: YouTube / Brisbane
Posts: 3,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NSanity View Post
That would be the shadow queue on the send connector. Mail isn't lost - outbound mail will be delayed, but Mail isn't supposed to be instant externally anyway.



Honestly, If you're going to 365 and you have no need for Exchange on-prem - don't even bother w/ Hybrid, just use skykick/migrationwiz and sip pina colada's with Dre.

Get handy w/ PS though - because you lose the ability to manage shit "teh oldfashioned way".
I picked hybrid for exactly this reason though, I knew it'd end up getting stalled on licenses... and sadly I was correct.

I used to work for an MSP before I came here where I migrated several clients using both skykick and migrationwiz, both were pretty good experiences. The standard cutover onboarding process is so much nicer, I do agree. Just not practical in this instance.
__________________
YouTube twitch.tv
Rig - 6700k - Maelstrom 240 - ROG Gene VIII - STRIX 1080 - 16gb DDR4 - TT Core P3
Boop - ATH-A700X - Yeti Blackout
Micro - HP N40L w/ Ubuntu, Sickrage, Plex, Deluge
Garage - Honda Hornet 900 & Fiesta ST & BF XR6 Turbo
martini.txt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 4:11 PM   #23314
NSanity
Member
 
NSanity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canberra
Posts: 15,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martini.txt View Post
I picked hybrid for exactly this reason though, I knew it'd end up getting stalled on licenses... and sadly I was correct.

I used to work for an MSP before I came here where I migrated several clients using both skykick and migrationwiz, both were pretty good experiences. The standard cutover onboarding process is so much nicer, I do agree. Just not practical in this instance.
honestly I'm still pretty hurt about the fact that Hybrid is cancer. So many caveats and weirdness - even 2016 to ExOn.
NSanity is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 4:13 PM   #23315
martini.txt
Member
 
martini.txt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: YouTube / Brisbane
Posts: 3,966
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NSanity View Post
honestly I'm still pretty hurt about the fact that Hybrid is cancer. So many caveats and weirdness - even 2016 to ExOn.
How about that calendar sharing between onprem and offprem mailboxes... so good
__________________
YouTube twitch.tv
Rig - 6700k - Maelstrom 240 - ROG Gene VIII - STRIX 1080 - 16gb DDR4 - TT Core P3
Boop - ATH-A700X - Yeti Blackout
Micro - HP N40L w/ Ubuntu, Sickrage, Plex, Deluge
Garage - Honda Hornet 900 & Fiesta ST & BF XR6 Turbo
martini.txt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 4:16 PM   #23316
NSanity
Member
 
NSanity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canberra
Posts: 15,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by martini.txt View Post
How about that calendar sharing between onprem and offprem mailboxes... so good
here use this hack that might work, until it doesn't.
NSanity is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 6:06 PM   #23317
GumbyNoTalent
Member
 
GumbyNoTalent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Briz Vegas
Posts: 3,661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbb1935 View Post
Total job "shouldn't take more than 2 days"
.....
Sweet you seem to have a complete handle on all the intricacies and pitfalls, I'll let you take that job!

Same when someone says that's a 5 minute job... then it just became your job!

Quote:
Originally Posted by elvis View Post
Am I missing something, surely you've outsourced this banal problem to some company that does email better than we could ever hope to do internally?

#ShitpostFriday
Automated that shit 7 years ago, manual builds are so 10 years ago!

Last edited by GumbyNoTalent; 19th May 2017 at 6:08 PM.
GumbyNoTalent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 6:54 PM   #23318
phreeky82
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,428
Default

I can understand why people outsource email, but never understood why people were so eager to. One of the least demanding systems to manage, and most of the work (helpdesk calls) don't go away regardless.
__________________
Successful trades: eyusuf, andy8, stuartl, michaeliam, theDarkHorse, bob
phreeky82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 7:07 PM   #23319
PabloEscobar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phreeky82 View Post
I can understand why people outsource email, but never understood why people were so eager to. One of the least demanding systems to manage, and most of the work (helpdesk calls) don't go away regardless.
Because the Opex bucket is easy to take money out of, but the Capex bucket is always empty.

$X/user/month is easier to get budget for than $X000 up front.
PabloEscobar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 7:07 PM   #23320
NSanity
Member
 
NSanity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Canberra
Posts: 15,858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phreeky82 View Post
I can understand why people outsource email, but never understood why people were so eager to. One of the least demanding systems to manage, and most of the work (helpdesk calls) don't go away regardless.
From what i've seen - its because a shit ton of people have implemented Exchange poorly and/or have inherited systems implemented poorly. Honestly, I've come across 2 deployments out of probably 100+ that I would say "hey, someone did this right, and all it needs is a certificate now and then or a patch".

Like a lot of MS stuff - it will largely just work, even if you're an absolute retard - but it becomes troublesome and painful to manage/operate.

Removing the design and implementation of the infrastructure side of Email is an obvious advantage if you're struggling because your core infrastructure was junk - hence its attraction.

However If you don't have those problems thrust upon you - I firmly believe (and have experience with) that it is administratively more cumbersome to manage O365/G-Suite than it is to manage a well tuned Exchange 2010 onwards deployment.

Depending on when you got on board with 365/Google Apps, I'd argue that 2003 was still easier if you were kicking those tyres with the cloud behemoths in the early early days.
NSanity is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 8:26 PM   #23321
PabloEscobar
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,264
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbb1935 View Post
Problem is, people that don't understand technology and just think "can't you just move this to there and it'll all work", without realising just how much is involved.
That's what the T part stands for in IT, and why I've got a Job.

If I'm not making it clear what the risks are with, and offering alternatives to, ideas proposed by those above and around me, I might as well not be there.
PabloEscobar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th May 2017, 9:02 PM   #23322
looktall
Working Class Hero
 
looktall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: brabham.wa.au
Posts: 22,928
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cbb1935 View Post

Tried twisting the O365 arm and got "too expensive, lets do when we downsize" (~ < 6 months).... and today "why aren't we going O365".
And?
What did you tell them?
looktall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2017, 12:37 PM   #23323
elvis Thread Starter
Old school old fool
 
elvis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 28,898
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phreeky82 View Post
I can understand why people outsource email, but never understood why people were so eager to. One of the least demanding systems to manage, and most of the work (helpdesk calls) don't go away regardless.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NSanity View Post
From what i've seen - its because a shit ton of people have implemented Exchange poorly and/or have inherited systems implemented poorly.
Nah, you're both missing the bigger picture.

As someone else here said a while back (might have been PabloEscobar, might have been someone else, can't remember), "email" isn't just "email" any more. What folks actually mean is "GroupWare".

"Exchange" isn't enough any more. Email is not the one and only way we collaborate and communicate. What we want now are tightly integrated systems of information sharing. If you don't have an integrated email, calendar, IM, voice/video/online-meeting, document/spreadsheet, knowledgebase, wiki, support portal, etc, etc system, then you're already behind.

Is "Exchange" non-demanding to manage? Sure. Is Exchange + Lync/Skype + SharePoint + Office + a bunch of other shit? Now you're starting to get into a world of high effort, high cost rollouts.

And this is where Microsoft missed the ball (initially, they're catching up now finally). Microsoft won the day in a pre-internet world *precisely because* of integration. They had a bunch of products that were quite frankly pretty average by themselves, but the sheer attraction was the end-to-end integration between all their stuff. Then this thing called the Internet happened, and Microsoft's model fell apart.

You've got that old model: "Buy version X of 5 different major products, integrate them, wait 2-3 years, version X+1 is released, wait for it to be tested and patched to SP1 and ready, buy it all again at huge dollar cost, upgrade your shit at huge I.T effort and dollar cost, and do it all again in 3 years". Suddenly there's a new model: "Pay a monthly subscription, have someone else constantly upgrade little tiny pieces of it as you go". Ask yourself - what version of GMail is out right now? Answer: who the fuck cares, it's always the latest. Is it a bit devops/#yolo? Sure, but that's what we demand these days. Today's release is tomorrow's legacy.

That last point is ludicrously important for me. I've got fuck-all spare staff and spare hours to throw at upgrades. I've got a metric shitload of other business problems that aren't generic, that literally no other company on Earth can do for me, that I need very my very industry-specific crew working on full time without distraction. I can't throw them at periodic upgrades. Worse, massive upgrades aren't just technical problems. They're people problems. Adapting folks to change is exhausting, and requires far more skill than just upgrading a software release. I can't think of software as "current here and now" any more. Everything I install, I need to think about what will happen when it's legacy. Jesus, look at the NHS and what happened to them, stuck on WindowsXP. Nightmare stuff.

Why do *I* outsource email? For the reasons above. First, it's not just email. It's a suite of stuff (we use 20 odd different, fully integrated Google tools in production, with lots more available to us). And it's upgraded for us constantly in small increments that don't shock our user base. Along with that is a constant, silent infrastructure upgrade to go with it. Our industry needs to invest every single dollar spent on hardware it can into render power. Unlike most reading this, we are constantly waiting for faster hardware to appear. For most, some 50+ core, 128GB+ RAM box is total overkill for what they need to do. For us, it could easily be 10 times faster and still not be fast enough. With that in mind, I don't want to be worrying about hardware for my auxiliary services. The fact that every now and then Google email me and go "oh hey, we just upgraded all your users to an extra 5GB of storage each, don't stress about it" means I know they'll take care of those constant micro upgrades in hardware as well as software.

(And I say "Google" in all of the above because that's what we went with - Office365 with the full suite of tools is just as competent, but was 3 years too late and too expensive for our business. However it is a good fit for many places today, and IMHO an upgrade to Exchange for all the reasons I outline in this post).

If it was literally *just* email, I'd still have my trusty Dovecot server running. But those days are long gone.
__________________
Play old games with me!

Last edited by elvis; 20th May 2017 at 12:55 PM.
elvis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2017, 2:44 PM   #23324
wintermute000
Member
 
wintermute000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 753
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NSanity View Post
From what i've seen - its because a shit ton of people have implemented Exchange poorly and/or have inherited systems implemented poorly. Honestly, I've come across 2 deployments out of probably 100+ that I would say "hey, someone did this right, and all it needs is a certificate now and then or a patch".

Like a lot of MS stuff - it will largely just work, even if you're an absolute retard - but it becomes troublesome and painful to manage/operate.

Removing the design and implementation of the infrastructure side of Email is an obvious advantage if you're struggling because your core infrastructure was junk - hence its attraction.

However If you don't have those problems thrust upon you - I firmly believe (and have experience with) that it is administratively more cumbersome to manage O365/G-Suite than it is to manage a well tuned Exchange 2010 onwards deployment.

Depending on when you got on board with 365/Google Apps, I'd argue that 2003 was still easier if you were kicking those tyres with the cloud behemoths in the early early days.
Are you factoring in hardware/storage/hypervisor/network/rack/power/cooling + redundancy and patching/upgrade and integration-into-XYZ work?
wintermute000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2017, 4:52 PM   #23325
Daemon
Member
 
Daemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: qld.au
Posts: 4,756
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by phreeky82 View Post
I can understand why people outsource email, but never understood why people were so eager to. One of the least demanding systems to manage, and most of the work (helpdesk calls) don't go away regardless.
Because it lowers the support calls further The calls do go away and on the rare occasions where there are issues with O365 / GApps... they're fixed far quicker than most Exchange failures.

End result is more time working on IT rather than working around shitty limitations and corner cases which take days to diagnose.

Quote:
Originally Posted by NSanity View Post
From what i've seen - its because a shit ton of people have implemented Exchange poorly and/or have inherited systems implemented poorly. Honestly, I've come across 2 deployments out of probably 100+ that I would say "hey, someone did this right, and all it needs is a certificate now and then or a patch".
I sell services purely based on the fact that MSP's are so good (read: days of downtime) at running Exchange in small offices. You'd hate to know how badly many of them are configured and how bad some of the systems really are. I still see Server 2003 with Exchange 2007 in active service, how they're missed is beyond me.

What's more, many of them quote many thousands to migrate to O365 for sub-10 mailboxes to ensure it's "too expensive" to move away. Even CBB's system could be migrated within a week, it's such trivial work with the right tools. So many cowboys out there unfortunately, if you've seen Exchange deployed and well maintained then you'd be in the minority.
__________________
Fixing the internet... one cloud at a time.
Daemon is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
OCAU is not responsible for the content of individual messages posted by others.
Other content copyright Overclockers Australia.
OCAU is hosted by Micron21!