Overclockers Australia Forums
OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors  

Go Back   Overclockers Australia Forums > Specific Hardware Topics > Video Cards & Monitors

Notices


Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!
Search our forums with Google:
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 16th April 2012, 1:52 PM   #121
auApex
Member
 
auApex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,081
Default

Are you trolling? I think you might be but I'll humour you anyway...

Bottom line is that a 27" IPS panel @ 1440p for ~$350 is amazing value, even with some of the negatives associated with these particular monitors.

You really need to consider where it sits in the market. With other TN 1080p monitors costing as much or more, it's a total no-brainer to pick a monitor with an IPS panel, much sharper resolution, way higher dot pitch and much greater screen size.

If you can't understand why people would pay an extra $50 for this monitor over a BenQ 24" TN 1080p screen, seek therapy!
__________________
3930K @ 4.4ghz ||Asrock Extreme9||7970 Crossfire||16GB Dominator Platinum 2133||720gb SSD + 6TB HDD||Strider 1200w||TJ07||U3011 + 2*2007FP||G19 & SS Sensei Pro||ATH-A900X on Asus Essence STX||Custom Watercooling|| My PC BF3 = auApex
auApex is offline   Reply With Quote

Join OCAU to remove this ad!
Old 16th April 2012, 1:56 PM   #122
demowhc
Member
 
demowhc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldnBold View Post
I didn't pay that much for my monitor.

Large IPS screen with the worst colour gamut of any others in existance and a 24" TN panel would kill it for gaming .. honestly, what is to like about these?
100hz 1440p LG IPS panel (same as used in U2711) with no shitty AG coating for under $400. Whats not to like apart from the crappy name?
demowhc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2012, 4:49 PM   #123
Muddy Funster
Member
 
Muddy Funster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Brisbane 4068
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by demowhc View Post
100hz 1440p LG IPS panel (same as used in U2711) with no shitty AG coating for under $400. Whats not to like apart from the crappy name?
But you cant get the 100hz at the moment can you?
Muddy Funster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2012, 5:36 PM   #124
Apokalipse
Member
 
Apokalipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,090
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muddy Funster View Post
But you cant get the 100hz at the moment can you?
You can unofficially get 100Hz with an Nvidia GPU or 85Hz with an AMD GPU with the right models.
__________________
Successful buys from: DAVID CLEM, caudex, In2nEt, ozdealer, mc^
Apokalipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 7:22 AM   #125
Muddy Funster
Member
 
Muddy Funster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Brisbane 4068
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apokalipse View Post
You can unofficially get 100Hz with an Nvidia GPU or 85Hz with an AMD GPU with the right models.
True, although those models (revisions?) are no longer available it seems.

Any chance anyone here has ordered a PCBank 27'? I'm quite keen on one of those from reading overseas results.
Muddy Funster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 12:38 PM   #126
demowhc
Member
 
demowhc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,722
Default

They are putting 2B back into production (model that can be oc'd to 100hz) due to user request apparently.

Even without 100hz it is the same LG panel used in the U2711 afaik, for half the price.
demowhc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 1:03 PM   #127
hvalac
Member
 
hvalac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Parmelia, W.A, 6167
Posts: 1,471
Default

if that 100hz model goes back into production I might need to get myself one of these in the next few months, i'm really keen to see what it's like for the price tag 1st hand.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by mshagg View Post
It seems cause for concern that so many people are being run over that we need to consider making it safer to be run over?
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmart38 View Post
They're rude because they have to deal with idiots like me all the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philll View Post
First, let's count the amount of fucks I give about what anyone else thinks. Let's do it, we'll start with 0. Okay: 0. All done.
hvalac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 2:49 PM   #128
Toliandar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 131
Default

Hopefully the bigger companies pick on the demand for a higher standard than 60Hz refresh rates.

I'm actually as to how this overclocking the refresh rate works? Are there monitors from bigger brands like Samsung that can be overclocked?
Toliandar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 3:33 PM   #129
RnR
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 5,938
Default

Is the pdf manual available somewhere to peruse?
RnR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 3:55 PM   #130
demowhc
Member
 
demowhc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toliandar View Post
Hopefully the bigger companies pick on the demand for a higher standard than 60Hz refresh rates.

I'm actually as to how this overclocking the refresh rate works? Are there monitors from bigger brands like Samsung that can be overclocked?
I think in general theres a few from different brands that can reach 65-66hz. I havent really heard of 100hz from a 1440p IPS panel before, but have seen some at 72 and even 96hz, mostly for advanced users that need video with no 3:2 pulldown.

I also hope the bigger companies pick up on this after seeing a bit of demand for the catleaps, I'd be happy with anything from 72 to 96hz, of course the higher the better, 120hz would be great.
demowhc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 4:10 PM   #131
OldnBold
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Canberra
Posts: 3,517
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by demowhc View Post
100hz 1440p LG IPS panel (same as used in U2711) with no shitty AG coating for under $400. Whats not to like apart from the crappy name?
Lots not to like. I have already mentioned the bad colour reproduction. Let's also drop in the lag of these monitors, supposedly rated at 6ms gtg (not that that is really worth anything). If the reviews are correct they are actually producing closer to 10ms or above. Input lag for fps games should be bag.

These are not the same panels as the Dells. For a start they are S-IPS and the Dell's are H-IPS.

If it were me I would buy a good TN 120Hz monitor for gaming and a decent IPS for photographic or video work.

This lot are monitors which really are good at nothing other than than the bare minimum. I just see no worthwhile application for these monitors other than web browsing and word processing.
__________________
ASUS Owners Club
OldnBold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 4:12 PM   #132
aussie-revhead
Member
 
aussie-revhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Western Sydney
Posts: 13,708
Default

OK what makes the panel so bad? LG make decent electronics right? Why would they purposefully make a crap panel? Or is response/colour reproduction etc limited by the control board? Why can this budget brand make a high res 100Hz+ screen when there is no hint of anyone else doing it yet?

__________________
Bench 1- R4F - 3930K - Team 2400c9 - Sapphire 7770 Ghz Edition - Enermax Revo1250 - water cooled tech bench - Samsung S27A950D
Netbox - waiting on Haswell parts ... - 4x2TB on Highpoint RAID - Lian Li v354 matx - Water cooled

BF3: OZrevhead
aussie-revhead is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2012, 4:58 PM   #133
demowhc
Member
 
demowhc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,722
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldnBold View Post
Lots not to like. I have already mentioned the bad colour reproduction. Let's also drop in the lag of these monitors, supposedly rated at 6ms gtg (not that that is really worth anything). If the reviews are correct they are actually producing closer to 10ms or above. Input lag for fps games should be bag.

These are not the same panels as the Dells. For a start they are S-IPS and the Dell's are H-IPS.

If it were me I would buy a good TN 120Hz monitor for gaming and a decent IPS for photographic or video work.

This lot are monitors which really are good at nothing other than than the bare minimum. I just see no worthwhile application for these monitors other than web browsing and word processing.
Well, they are advertised as S-IPS.

I thought there was no input lag as they dont use a scaler, or you can get it without a scaler.

6ms G2G is standard for IPS, and I've read from numerous places they are the exact same panel as in the U2711, except the "A" and "A-" panels which are allowed to ship with up to 6 dead pixels, so luck of the draw there.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aussie-revhead View Post
OK what makes the panel so bad? LG make decent electronics right? Why would they purposefully make a crap panel? Or is response/colour reproduction etc limited by the control board? Why can this budget brand make a high res 100Hz+ screen when there is no hint of anyone else doing it yet?

Its the LG S-IPS "A" and "A-" panels afaik, instead of the "A+" panels used in U2711, which means they can be shipped with minor defects or a couple dead pixels if you're unlucky. The monitor itself is very limited and bare bones, no osd for settings etc.

The overclocking is just from pcb components that can handle higher refresh rates, although they are only rated for 60hz. They started using a cheaper PCB with the 2C revision, and this cannot be overclocked past ~66hz.
demowhc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th April 2012, 5:56 PM   #134
C0L0N3L
Iron Photographer
 
C0L0N3L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Sunny Coast
Posts: 507
Default

Just plugged mine in not 5 min ago..

Immediate impressions..

Its big, bright, cool and wonky.

Will mess around with some just the nvida colour profile to see if I can fix it up.

Tried changing to 98Hz said wasn't supported then tried 85 and it broke it.. had to turn it off then on again.

Haven't noticed any dodgy pixels yet.
__________________
PC: Q6600 | GA EP45-DS3L | 8GB RAM | HD 7770 | ~5TB of WD <3 | 27"+22"x2 | LOGITECH G15 & MX518 | WC | Laptop: Macbook Air i7
Camera: Nikon D700 | 80-200 f2.8 AF-S | 24mm f2.8 | 35mm f2 | 50mm f1.8 | 85mm f1.4 | Lights | My Flickr
Phone: SGS3 GT-I9305T | Running Jellybean 4.1.1
Over $5500 in trades.
C0L0N3L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th April 2012, 4:26 AM   #135
demowhc
Member
 
demowhc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,722
Default

Do you know which revision you have? if its 2C, you wont be able to get the refresh rate past ~66 unfortunately.
demowhc is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 11:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. -
OCAU is not responsible for the content of individual messages posted by others.
Other content copyright Overclockers Australia.
OCAU is hosted by Internode!