![]() |
![]() OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! Search our forums with Google: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,642
|
So i see lots of people who claim to be boosting host to host (Not multiple hosts to a single host) throughput/bandwidth by trunking ethernet ports. How exactly does this work?
Say if i have two Gb NIC's in two computers, both of them connected to a managed switch, does that mean i now have 2Gb/s throughput between the two computers?
__________________
Last edited by Hive; 23rd May 2012 at 10:56 AM. |
|
|
|
| Join OCAU to remove this ad! |
|
|
#2 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,541
|
Quote:
__________________
WTB: Any one have a VT SS Commodore die cast model in heron white? Please PM Me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 3,642
|
Both are using 802.3ad aggregation, jumbo frames on (switch and server + other PC) RAMdrives on each, but the link never goes past 1Gbit/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,841
|
You need to check your load balancing method.
many methods will experience what you are seeing thou, 1gbit maximum because all the session characteristics are the same. For example some devices allow load balancing on destination IP or destination port. In a single TCP session both these remain the same so they land on the same link. If you do source IP and you transfer from different source PCs you can be lucky and 2 IPs land on seperate links or unlucky and they both land on the same link and both get 500mbit each. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|