![]() |
![]() OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! Search our forums with Google: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
|
Hey guys,
I have a norco 4224 and it has 6x2TB hdds in RAIDZ2 in it atm. I was looking to expand to 12 HDDS in the near future. My question is: If I add another vdev with another 6 hdds in it, do 2 of the hdds from the new vdev go into parity or does it expand and just add them to the total storage keeping 2 drives worth of parity over the 12 drives? I had a look around online but there doesn't seem to be a definitive answer, and the wiki page is quite vague. Thanks in advance |
|
|
|
| Join OCAU to remove this ad! |
|
|
#2 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ellenbrook, WA
Posts: 157
|
Each vdev is independent, therefore each raidz2 will have (n-2) space for data. After adding it to the same pool new data will be striped across both vdevs
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
|
so if i have 12 disks, 6 in one vdev and 6 in another, i will only get 8 disks worth of storage?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 301
|
Correct. You will have the equivalent of a RAID60.
__________________
Check out my [WTB]: http://forums.overclockers.com.au/sh....php?t=1029985 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
|
that's pretty inconvenient
sucks that you can't just add to existing vdevs, probably should have thought about that before going zfs, everyone is raving about it online i thought i'd give it a go, probably a standard raid6 would have been a better choice :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 2,439
|
Quote:
think of it as 4 Drives worth of protection ![]() . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
|
I'll be happy if i have 3-4 drives fail i'm sure :P
edit: there are 24 hard drive slots, and i've used 6 of them, leaving 18. Is it possible to have a single raidz2 vdev with 18 hdds in it to only have to have 4 parity drives? also is it possible to have the remaining 18 drives in 2 9 drive vdevs to have 6 parity drives? if i end up with 4x6 drive vdevs, i'm looking at 8 parity drives.... Last edited by twinhardballers; 31st May 2012 at 10:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: SA
Posts: 445
|
If you're not too concerned about data loss/drive failures - why not just use raidz instead of raidz2?
__________________
hihi :] |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
|
Is it possible to have a zpool with vdevs which are RAIDZ and RAIDZ2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 328
|
If I had a Norco (one can plan...) I'd be going with 3 8 Drive (6+2) RaidZ2 vdevs. That way with all 24 drives you'd have 6 drives for parity and still 18 drives for data.
My advice is instead of getting another 6 drives, get 8 instead. Make it a 6+2 RaidZ2, move all your data across to it - then grab another two drives, destroy and rebuild the original 6 drive array into an 8 as well and add it to the pool.
__________________
NeOnServ 2.0: Ubuntu 12.04LTS | Q6600 | 8gb | G/A 8EP35-DS3P | AOC-USAS-L8i | 15x 2tb Samsung HD204UI (ZFS Raid-Z2) | CMStacker 810 |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 677
|
That is almost exactly what I was thinking, great advice, I might do that
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,101
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|