Overclockers Australia Forums
OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors  

Go Back   Overclockers Australia Forums > Manufacturer-specific Forums > Other CPUs and chipsets

Notices


Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!
Search our forums with Google:
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 19th July 2001, 11:35 AM   #1
scummer Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 16
Default P3V4X and 512 megs of memory

I just ordered a second 256 meg stick of Crucial ram. I havn't recieved it yet but was wondering if any of you saw any difference going from 256 to 512? I'll probably migrate over to Win XP for a little sadistic self pleasuring, so the added memory shouldn't go to waste if I get no improvement under WinME. I was just curious what others found.


ASUS P3V4X, Apollo Pro133A,1005 bios
Step ThermoDynamics PIII 700 @ 933 1.90 vcore
Promise Fasttrack 100 (raid 0)
2x IBM GXP75
SB Live Platinum
256 meg Crucial cas2 ram
Pioneer 115 DVD
Plextor 16/10/40A CDRW
Utobia DVD decoder with Remote
ZIP Drive
Netgear nic
WIN ME
Radeon 32DDR clocked 187MHz
scummer is offline   Reply With Quote

Join OCAU to remove this ad!
Old 19th July 2001, 12:19 PM   #2
scummer Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 16
Default

One other thing, are there any settings in windows that should be changed to help make full use of the extra memory? Maybe a program like cache man or something along those lines?
Thanks!
scummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th July 2001, 7:25 PM   #3
PersianImmortal
Member
 
PersianImmortal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Canberra
Posts: 6,375
Default

Definitely use Cacheman because it limits your vcache forcing your system to use the physical RAM as much as possible rather than the hard disk.
PersianImmortal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2001, 7:26 AM   #4
Powermike
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Germany
Posts: 128
Thumbs down

Win Me with 512 MB RAM is wasted money unless you are using dtp or graphics editing programs that need a lot of memory. On a normal Office/Gaming-PC you'll never notice a difference between 256 and 512 MB RAM besides a bigger disk cache.

If you use cacheman which limits the disc cache you'll loose that only advantage, too.

Maybe using Windows 2000 and XP (both can handle big amounts of memory better than Win9x/Me) there might be a small performance increase using 512 instead of 256 MB but not worth the money...

Powermike
Powermike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th July 2001, 10:37 AM   #5
scummer Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 16
Default

Thanks for your responses. The memory only set me back $45.00 so I think I'll try it. It just might come in handy for a little photoshop work or it may end up in an older system thats a little shy on memory. Again, Thanks.
scummer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 12:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. -
OCAU is not responsible for the content of individual messages posted by others.
Other content copyright Overclockers Australia.
OCAU is hosted by Internode!