Overclockers Australia Forums
OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors  

Go Back   Overclockers Australia Forums > General Topics > Overclocking & Hardware

Notices


Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!
Search our forums with Google:
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 15th October 2006, 8:04 PM   #16
chainbolt
Little member
 
chainbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 76,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben Ifin
Chainbolt

What 120mm fan are you running on you Big Typhoons ?

Ben
Currently Sanyo Denki: Full size 120 mm fan at 3,000 and 130 CFM. That's around double the performance of the fan that comes with the BT. The noise is still ok. I have an industry grade 8,000 RPM 120 mm fan from Sanyo Denki, that produces almost 300 CFM, but the noise is unbearable.
chainbolt is offline   Reply With Quote

Join OCAU to remove this ad!
Old 15th October 2006, 8:12 PM   #17
chainbolt
Little member
 
chainbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 76,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slobber
You've lost me chainy, I dont understant your statement or maybe I just need a hammer to the back of the head

I have always thought that its good if the CPU fan also blows over the fets at the same time as cooling the CPU ????

Thats what the BIG T does, same as the Thermalright coolers, both of which are the best choise to buy

I think we are talking about the same thing, sorry for my bad English.

There are HSF that blow onto the PCB, like the INTEL reference fan, the BT and the Mini BT, and SP-90, the SP-120, and the SI-128. This is good, because it follows the Intel reference design, the mosefts and the NB and various other components are cooled to gether with the CPU sink.

Then we have HSF that blow "over" the PCB, like the Scythe Ninja and Infiniti, various Zalman design, the Cooler Master Hyper 6+, etc. I don't say that these HSF are bad, but I found that the design where the fan is blowing into the CPU sink are better, and additionally you get cooling for the NB and the mosfets.

Last edited by chainbolt; 15th October 2006 at 11:00 PM.
chainbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2006, 9:32 PM   #18
lowdog
Member
 
lowdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dreamland.
Posts: 3,869
Default

Not sure but I think the Thermalright Ultra 120 is the newest model http://www.pccasegear.com.au/prod4119.htm

It has 8 heatpipes and a new fin design wheras the SI-128 has 4 heatpipes. The Ultra 120 weighs an extra 300g more than the SI-128 as well.

It's heavy all right but lucky for me I have a bracket attached to the case the rests under the end or the Ultra 120 and helps support it, the bracket also mounts an additional 120mm fan that is blowing directly onto the nth bridge heatsink and mofets heatsinks on my P5W64.............which is better than having the warm air from the heatsink fan blowing over the mobo imho.

I'm using it and with X6800 @ 3500Mhz stock vcore and my dual prime temps are 51C max.
__________________
lowdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2006, 10:03 PM   #19
Submariner
Member
 
Submariner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Suffolk Park, NSW
Posts: 2,787
Default

lowdog, the SI-128 is the newest blow down model.

Maybe we should come up with some cool names to differentiate between a blow down (best for overclocker) and a blow thru (best for silent PC) heatsink
__________________
Knowledge Brings Fear
Submariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2006, 10:13 PM   #20
lowdog
Member
 
lowdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dreamland.
Posts: 3,869
Default

Blow down, blow through, blah

I think the way I have my blow through model set up is better than having the blow down model anyway because I have a blow down fan below it blowing down directly onto the nth bridge, mofets and ram while the blow through above it is blowing through to the rear case fan that is blowing out of the case. ......lot of blowing going on there. Seems to be working fine for me.
__________________

Last edited by lowdog; 15th October 2006 at 10:16 PM.
lowdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2006, 11:02 PM   #21
chainbolt
Little member
 
chainbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 76,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Submariner
lowdog, the SI-128 is the newest blow down model.

Maybe we should come up with some cool names to differentiate between a blow down (best for overclocker) and a blow thru (best for silent PC) heatsink
That exactly is the point. The "blow thru" HSF are designed for another purpose than the "blow down" HSF.
chainbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2006, 11:57 PM   #22
Luke212
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NSW
Posts: 6,421
Default

I would think that the blow through fans would have better overclocking capability, because blow downs cause expelled air to be recycled. Bow through fans send hot air straight to an exhaust point.

If you need mosfet cooling, use a second fan for that, also pointing towards the exhaust point.
Luke212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 2:17 AM   #23
chainbolt
Little member
 
chainbolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 76,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke212
I would think that the blow through fans would have better overclocking capability, because blow downs cause expelled air to be recycled. Bow through fans send hot air straight to an exhaust point.
But they neither can cool the CPU sink directly, nor do they cover the mosfets and the NB. It's pretty obvious why Intel's reference is calling for a blown down cooler. The recommended PCB lay out seems to be for such HSF, and not for blow through. Of course, the stronger the fan, and the more fans are used, for example for active NB cooling, the less this is an disadvantage.
chainbolt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 7:34 AM   #24
lowdog
Member
 
lowdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dreamland.
Posts: 3,869
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chainbolt
But they neither can cool the CPU sink directly, nor do they cover the mosfets and the NB.
With both the SI-128 and the Ultra 120 air on the cpu sink does nothing. The heatpipes take away the heat from the contact point of the heatsink and the cpu. Air passing through the fins where the heatpipes terminate is the active factor in the cooling process with both heatsink designes.

Air is heated after it passes through the fins and the dissadvantage of the blowdown model is that this heated air is blown over the mobo. I'm not saying air blown over the mobo is a bad thing but cool air is better than heated/recycled air. If the blowthrough model can deliver it's heated air straight to an exhaust fan and you have a seperate fan blowing over the mobo that is delivering cool/fresh unheated air then it should give better cooling results.

As I mentioned above; the Ultra 120 has 8 heatpipes V's the 4 heatpipes of the SI-128 and with the actual heatpipes being the active medium for heat transfer theorietically it should be the superior preformer.
__________________
lowdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 8:31 AM   #25
Luke212
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NSW
Posts: 6,421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chainbolt
But they neither can cool the CPU sink directly, nor do they cover the mosfets and the NB. It's pretty obvious why Intel's reference is calling for a blown down cooler. The recommended PCB lay out seems to be for such HSF, and not for blow through. Of course, the stronger the fan, and the more fans are used, for example for active NB cooling, the less this is an disadvantage.
air blowing directly onto the cpu core, taken in isolation will probably provide better cooling. after all some cooling is better than no cooling. However it is not realistically going to provide superior cooling due to:
1. minimal surface area on the base of the cpu sink (i mean like 1% improvement in isolation)
2. increased turbulence reduces fan performance and increases noise.
3. more hot air is recycled.

My case's front wall is entirely made up of 3x 12cm fans. the back is open. a 12cm fan pointing back on the cpu provides 4x12cm fans of near silent cooling power. All drives and psu are in a separate compartment. Especially in this case (although non-typical) I would definately not use a down blower over a through blower!
Luke212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 11:52 AM   #26
Dangerman
Member
 
Dangerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 137
Default

One of the major reasons I like the Zalman CNPS9500 is its really easy to clean.

I have floorboards and tiles at my place which seemd to be dustier than carpet. Also have a wood heater which adds to the amonuts of dust particles in the air.

I was forever cleaning out the HSF on my P4, which ment removing the HFS and I would wash the HS with hot water and then use my wifes hair drier on it before reattaching.

The Zalman cooler seems to work fine at keeping the cpu cool, and is every easy to clean, a quick suck with the nossel of the vacuum cleaner and shes good to go. No need to remove it at all.

I also think the design allows for far better airflow though my case, I have a Thermaltake Xaser 111 which came with 7 case fans.

I have removed two of them which blow air directly onto the cpu/card area, as Im sure all they did was make the air turblent.

I have two fans blowing across the Hard drives at the front, two behind the cpu sucking hot air out of the case and one in the top sucking air out.

I plan to do a mild overclock with my new conroe E6600, if I think the Mobo is getting too hot, a few heatsinks added to the mobo would take care of that.

Danger
Dangerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 12:18 PM   #27
lowdog
Member
 
lowdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Dreamland.
Posts: 3,869
Default

Check this comparison between heatsinks, it's in German though but the results in the graph says it all. http://www.hartware.de/review_604_7.html

The Thermalright Ultra 120 comes out on top.
__________________
lowdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 12:57 PM   #28
Luke212
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NSW
Posts: 6,421
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lowdog
Check this comparison between heatsinks, it's in German though but the results in the graph says it all. http://www.hartware.de/review_604_7.html

The Thermalright Ultra 120 comes out on top.
Its hard to clearly say which is the best.

In this review the Tuniq Tower 120 comes out on top.


My pick is either a Tuniq Tower 120 if you can find one, or a Ninja.
Luke212 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 1:44 PM   #29
richardnau
Member
 
richardnau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Sydney
Posts: 35
Default

Serious OCers probably don't worry about trying to slow down the fans, but I'll ask the question anyway.

If you get a cooler that requires a 120mm fan (or you replace the 120mm fan on your cooler), where can you get a decent (choose your own definintion of decent) 120mm fan with 4-wire connector to plug into the 4-wire PWM CPU fan circuit on a current motherboard?
richardnau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th October 2006, 4:54 PM   #30
Submariner
Member
 
Submariner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Suffolk Park, NSW
Posts: 2,787
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lowdog
Check this comparison between heatsinks, it's in German though but the results in the graph says it all. http://www.hartware.de/review_604_7.html

The Thermalright Ultra 120 comes out on top.
Not being able to read German, I cannot read how they have set up their test system - in a case or no case? They use a low speed fan (1140rpm).

Out of the Ultra 120 and the SI-128, the SI-128 is the newest model, but only by a couple of days. It is the way Thermalright is marketing the heatsinks. The Ultra is designed for a silent PC and AFAIK that is why it is bigger, it can use a quieter fan. To get it to work as an overclocking heatsink you need to increase the air flow and that defeats the purpose of a quiet PC, but does not mean it is a bad heatsink for overclocking. It does mean you have to know what you are doing when you use a blow thru, to get the best out of it.
__________________
Knowledge Brings Fear
Submariner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
cooler, coolers, core, core2duo, core2quad, cpu, heatsink, quad

Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 3:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. -
OCAU is not responsible for the content of individual messages posted by others.
Other content copyright Overclockers Australia.
OCAU is hosted by Internode!