![]() |
![]() OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! Search our forums with Google: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#16 |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,724
|
the other thing is i guess i also see SC going downhill
a case in point is their "DC relay circuit" in the same issue of SC on page 76. they've used way to many components to create that circuit which is essentially a side-effect of using a really cheap optocoupler that doesn't have a Darlington transistor in it. ... which, as a result, cascades throughout the entire design, perhaps using 3x more discrete components than are necessary. if instead they'd used the optocoupler with an integrated Darlington, (about $0.60 more), you could remove just about all the other parts. its that same "old school" mentality. while i don't agree with all views expressed, the "Silicon Chip magazine" thread in aus.electronics has been somewhat enlightening .. i haven't been interested in electronics through the life of SC (& demise of its competitors) but do think its going downhill. i haven't resubscribed nor do i plan to do much more than glance over it whenever i'm at Borders or similar. for my money (actually - was part of a christmas present), i now have subscriptions to Make magazine and Nults & Volts. cheers. |
|
|
|
| Join OCAU to remove this ad! |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|