Overclockers Australia Forums
OCAU News - Wiki - PC Database - QuickLinks - Job Search - Pix - Sponsors  

Go Back   Overclockers Australia Forums > Specific Hardware Topics > Portable and Small Form Factor


Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11th May 2008, 5:43 PM   #1
T0fu Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 1,099
Default celeron m540 vs c2d T5670

hello! <: looking forward to purchasing a my first laptop but i cant decide on what to buy,

im a student have a budget of abt 800 aud and am currently deciding between 2 differently specced 1310's from http://www1.ca.dell.com/content/prod...dt1&l=en&s=bsd
i realise they are canadian but i do have relatives with a permanent address there and some other relatives visiting canada within the month(may) so it will most likely be from there

whats bothering me is which cpu should i buy, because upgrading or getting something above a celeron seems to be quite expensive, however im not sure if its actually worth it

i will most likely be getting the 8400m gs with the laptop and a 9cell battery and i would like to know if the core2duo actually has any major performance benefits over the celeron when paired with a pretty dismal 8400m

the games i am most likely to be playing on this laptop are counterstrike source, team fortress 2 and quake3 possibly starcraft 2 when that arrives
when its not used for gaming it will prolly be used for pretty easy tasks such as word processing , spreadsheets and web browsing, and playing back movies i wont be doing any photoshop or moviemaking on the lappy.

so is the c2d worth it over the celeron ? or will tehre be little difference becauuse of the graphics card bottleneck
__________________
i5 i750 | 2 x 2gb DDR3 1600 | 1tb WD Caviar Black | HD3850 256 | black ugly rusting shitbox of a case| P55UD3 vanilla | 500w Zalman RS | Filco Zero Tenkeyless
T0fu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2008, 6:15 PM   #2
_the_duke_
Member
 
_the_duke_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,992
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by T0fu View Post
so is the c2d worth it over the celeron?
Definitely.
__________________
Do you see the way that tree bends?
_the_duke_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2008, 6:21 PM   #3
Deanodriver
Member
 
Deanodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,953
Default

As an owner of a Celeron M 540, I'd agree with _the_duke_, particularly if it's running Windows Vista
__________________
sifnt.net.au | I brew, therefore I am.
Deanodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2008, 8:28 PM   #4
T0fu Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 1,099
Default

so celeron is terrible for playing HD, or just having msword and firefox+youtube open ??

cos i have an e6300 (1.8ghz same as c2d and celeron) desktop and it only uses 1 core most of the time,

but yeah if teh celeron cant cop HD playback then thats definately a no no
__________________
i5 i750 | 2 x 2gb DDR3 1600 | 1tb WD Caviar Black | HD3850 256 | black ugly rusting shitbox of a case| P55UD3 vanilla | 500w Zalman RS | Filco Zero Tenkeyless

Last edited by T0fu; 11th May 2008 at 11:49 PM.
T0fu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2008, 11:03 AM   #5
natman
Member
 
natman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 71
Default

A lot of people bag the celeron without anything to back it up.
The main disadvantage is the lack of speedstep. Performance wise it would be similar to the c2d unless you do a lot of stuff that utilizes dual cores.
natman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2008, 12:29 PM   #6
Deanodriver
Member
 
Deanodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 6,953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by natman View Post
A lot of people bag the celeron without anything to back it up.
The main disadvantage is the lack of speedstep. Performance wise it would be similar to the c2d unless you do a lot of stuff that utilizes dual cores.
Which in a laptop, is a fairly big oversight. I only get about 2-2.5 hours battery life from this Celeron laptop.

I'd guess the performance would be on par with a single core A64, but I haven't benchmarked it against anything to confirm that.

It does struggle a bit with Windows Vista unless you turn some features off (desktop compositing mainly), even with 2.5GB of RAM.
__________________
sifnt.net.au | I brew, therefore I am.
Deanodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th May 2008, 2:15 PM   #7
T0fu Thread Starter
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: SYDNEY
Posts: 1,099
Default

as mentioned in OP it will have a 9cell with it , is there a way i can just clock it in windows to run slower? or do i have to do it through bios?
__________________
i5 i750 | 2 x 2gb DDR3 1600 | 1tb WD Caviar Black | HD3850 256 | black ugly rusting shitbox of a case| P55UD3 vanilla | 500w Zalman RS | Filco Zero Tenkeyless
T0fu is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 2:35 AM.


eXTReMe Tracker
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. - This page served to you by: surf
OCAU is not responsible for the content of individual messages posted by others.
Other content copyright Overclockers Australia.
OCAU is hosted by Internode!