![]() |
OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors |
|
|||||||
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! Search our forums with Google: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 202
|
Hi all,
On a 32bit os, is it possible to have 4gig (or 3.5gig under pae) and a 4gig ramdisk under a 8gig ram box? i had a look at superspeed's ramdisk, and they state this software can access the memory above the 4gig limit. How is that possible? Does it work? Has anyone got it working? |
|
|
|
| Join OCAU to remove this ad! |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
(Banned or Deleted)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Forever A Pwn
Posts: 5,985
|
Just get XP X64 or Vista SP1 64bit
No use mucking around with 3rd party programs, you really need 64bit to take advantage of all that ram mate. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 817
|
No it shouldn't be possible on a 32bit OS. It just physically cant address to any of those memory locations, I severely doubt it can address over the 4gig limit without a 64 bit OS.
__________________
Server: Xeon E3-1220|Intel S1200BTL|2x4GB DDR3 ECC|Corsair 120GB SSD|Highpoint RocketRAID 2740|14 x 5TB Seagate HDDs|Chenbro RM31616M2|Windows Server 2012R2 Gaming/HTPC: i5-7600k|Gigabyte Z270N-WIFI|Corsair 2x8GB DDR4-3333|EVGA GTX1070 SC Gaming|SeaSonic 520W Fanless PSU|Samsung 950 Pro|Fractal Design Node 605 Case + Noctua fans|Windows 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Sydney
Posts: 1,231
|
I think only windows server is supported?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
SLATYE, not SLAYTE
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canberra
Posts: 26,787
|
I suppose it might be possible. It'd probably mean forcing PAE on (which would require XP SP0/SP1; SP2 disabled PAE completely) but then making sure that all accessible memory/devices lived in the 0 - 4GB region (to avoid confusing the 32-bit drivers). The RAMdisk progam would then have to access the remaining memory.
Unfortunately this would require substantial modifications to the whole OS, as the default settings are that device addresses start at the top of the accessible memory values. I doubt that any current software would do it; too much chance of a mistake causing utter chaos. The only reasonable easy way I could see to do it would be for the software to load before the OS does and report to the OS that there's 4GB of RAM and a 4GB HDD connected. Again, that'd be a pretty substantial modification. As was mentioned above, SuperSpeed's software doesn't support Windows XP. What it does support are some 32-bit operating systems that don't officially support PAE, but are heavily based on versions that do support PAE (for example, Windows 2000 Server doesn't support PAE - but Advanced Server does). Because they're so closely related, the drivers will all support PAE (as they work with both versions), and the OS itself may well actually support PAE (I wouldn't be surprised if there is PAE support but with a RAM limit of 4GB, which makes PAE somewhat useless normally). SuperSpeed's software can just borrow the RAM that is accessible by Windows but not actually usable (due to the restriction on maximum usable RAM).
__________________
Supermicro X8DAE | 2x Xeon L5640 | 24GB ECC/registered DDR3-1333 | 256GB Intel 740 SSD |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Melbourne, not too far from Monash Uni.
Posts: 5,373
|
SLATYE, Superspeeds ramdisk is supported under xp. I agree with rest of your post.
I've used this software to create ramdisk (128mb) on 2Gb ram A64 3200+ system and it creates ramdisk within what Win is able to address. Best answer is for OP to contact the company to find out. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: om nom nom nom
Posts: 2,925
|
RamDisk Plus 9 has a most unique feature. Our patent pending technology can access memory beyond the limitation imposed by a Windows 32-bit operating system! In other words, RamDisk Plus 9 can use "unmanaged" Windows' memory e.g. above 4GB. It can also use the stubbornly inaccessable memory between 3.2GB and 4GB.
See the product's help file for detailed explanation of what "unmanaged" memory is and how to access and use it with RamDisk Plus 9. Click here to request a server evaluation copy. i find that very hard to believe... but it does say that the 32-bit version supports ramdisks up to 120GB and the 64-bit version supports ramdisks up to 512GB HERES THE IMPORTANT STUFFS!!! ![]() that tells me that desktop OS are under normal 32-bit restrictions.
__________________
Well done! Your ability to walk short distances without dying will be Handsome Jack's Downfall! Last edited by gaspah; 14th October 2008 at 7:12 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: ADL/SA The Monopoly State
Posts: 18,016
|
Quote:
32bit server has always had more memory support than desktop for windows. all superspeed are doing is making multiple drivers and linking each 2gb section together to make a single virtual drive if they put XP on that list it would say 4GB/3GB /2CPU![]() to the op, NO YOU CANNOT. ramdisk programs are driver level, they only work with what you have, not what you dont have. now if someone could make a bios level ramdisk program so it appears as a real drive before OS, thats a winner. Last edited by terrastrife; 15th October 2008 at 4:38 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisbane (nth), Australia
Posts: 6,646
|
Now pick the OS the OP is talking about that's NOT listed..
__________________
_,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_¸,ø¤°`°¤ø,¸_ WTB: Cisco 1801-M PM me Please rehash my posts and pass them off as your own ideas! Triple points for doing it in the same page of the thread. Plagiarism is the sincerest form of copyright infringement. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: om nom nom nom
Posts: 2,925
|
Quote:
yeah it was kinda my whole point.. people seem to miss that.... to spell it out.. i'd put windows xp as the same category as "Windows Server 2003 Standard"
__________________
Well done! Your ability to walk short distances without dying will be Handsome Jack's Downfall! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 6,825
|
Quote:
I ask this because I recently built a new rig with a Intel C2D, P45 board and 4 GB of physical RAM. Windows reports PAE is enabled HOWEVER I am running SP3... so does this mean PAE is working and if so does that mean it has been reenabled in SP3? Additional to the topic, I was under the impression that applications in Win32 could only ever use 2GB of physical memory anyway? EDIT: I found this which lists at the very bottom the Windows versions and their level of PAE support. Last edited by SenorGrande; 15th October 2008 at 3:35 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 3,580
|
Quote:
Quote:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366778.aspx
__________________
I've got some computers :P Last edited by FLB; 15th October 2008 at 3:46 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 3,438
|
As above. No it won't work on XP.
No real reason for it not to except MS have taken the 4GB barrier and used it as an excuse to force people into Vista/Server 2008. (Support for XP64bit is average).
__________________
i7 920@3.8ghz/thermright 120 ultra extreme/6GB Ram/770GTX/Dell 24" TFTx2 OCAU Camera Club Member Nikon D7100, Nikon 35mm/50mm/85mm F1.8,Sigma 10-20mm, Nikon 80-200mm F2.8, Nikon 17-35mm F2.8 (plus the kit 18-55 and 55-200mm VR) |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! |
|
|