Battlefield 3 - Page 2

MrSmoke · 12th June 2009, 4:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fresh79

PLEASE DONT FUCK IT UP!!!!

agreed
but it probably will get fucked up with bugs

CordlezToaster · 12th June 2009, 4:46 PM

great another fuckup

TXN · 12th June 2009, 4:56 PM

Eh, quit with the negativity. Only one way to find out which way this is going.

UncleRes · 12th June 2009, 5:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zerstorer

BF3! Yes! It'll be a bugfest but the Frostbite engine is fantastic and will make it even more awesome.

I do wonder how it'll fit with BC2 coming.

I presume BC2 will continue BC's push towards smaller close quarters, high intensity maps with 24-32 players max, and BF3 will be more of a classic BF game with 64 (probably 128 max) player massive maps.

If thats the case, I actually see BC2 being the better game for me, I wouldn't be the only one who had a ton more fun with BC on the consoles than I ever did with BF2 on the PC.

Zerstorer · 12th June 2009, 6:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UncleRes

I wouldn't be the only one who had a ton more fun with BC on the consoles than I ever did with BF2 on the PC.

If EA didn't force you to play on US hosted servers in BC then I would have like it a whole lot more. I could only stand to play about 5 hours of MP as the lag got to me, but I really liked what I did play.

C0ncrete · 12th June 2009, 8:05 PM

Is DICE Swedan the good DICE or the bad DICE?

I can't remember.

funkthis · 12th June 2009, 8:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by C0ncrete

Is DICE Swedan the good DICE or the bad DICE?

I can't remember.

There's only the Swedish DICE now, you may be thinking of the New York DICE which became Kaos Studios and I think they worked on BF2142.

Or perhaps you're confusing it with Activision and the Call of Duty series where Treyarch release the shitty Call of Duty versions and Infinity Ward release the good ones.

mAJORD · 12th June 2009, 9:25 PM

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

flinchy · 12th June 2009, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matex

"After saying that the download-only Battlefield 1943 has been "selling well," "

It's not out yet?

exactly

and why the hell are they announcing it before they've even released 1943? pretty poor imo, it's like they dont even care about 1943 :/

Quote:

Originally Posted by funkthis

There's only the Swedish DICE now, you may be thinking of the New York DICE which became Kaos Studios and I think they worked on BF2142.

Or perhaps you're confusing it with Activision and the Call of Duty series where Treyarch release the shitty Call of Duty versions and Infinity Ward release the good ones.

they have their pros and cons
treyarch: awesome ideas/features (co-op, nazis, innovating the multiplayer at least a bit, collectable unlockableness for awesome modifiers.)
con: shitt master server needed for multpiplayer rage
IW: better story/SP gameplay... creating the bulk of the original awesome ideas... i guess?.

World at war was a mighty fine game imo. not the same final quality as MW, but fine multiplayer nonetheless.

zaneus · 12th June 2009, 11:52 PM

1943 is a 3 map, 3 class demo of the frostbite engine. It's not a full game so it shouldn't be treated as such. BC2 and BF3 will be the real "games" for this engine.

I have high hopes, should be fun none the less. The rego of BF2 isn't TOO bad once you get used to it. Plus you can blame all your deaths on terrible rego so you feel a little better

trevor68 · 13th June 2009, 12:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by funkthis

There's only the Swedish DICE now, you may be thinking of the New York DICE which became Kaos Studios and I think they worked on BF2142.

KAOS were originally Trauma Studios of Desert Combat fame, some went on to work on BF2 itself for DICE, then they formed their own studio and released Frontlines.

Their second game HomeFront will prob be on a similar release schedule to BF3 at a guess.

mAJORD · 13th June 2009, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flinchy

exactly

and why the hell are they announcing it before they've even released 1943? pretty poor imo, it's like they dont even care about 1943 :/

they have their pros and cons
treyarch: awesome ideas/features (co-op, nazis, innovating the multiplayer at least a bit, collectable unlockableness for awesome modifiers.)
con: shitt master server needed for multpiplayer rage
IW: better story/SP gameplay... creating the bulk of the original awesome ideas... i guess?.

World at war was a mighty fine game imo. not the same final quality as MW, but fine multiplayer nonetheless.

sorry, I havent read any further detail, but the OP's link isn't an announcment. It's a comment made by one person..

Frontl1ne · 13th June 2009, 2:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mAJORD

sorry, I havent read any further detail, but the OP's link isn't an announcment. It's a comment made by one person..

Who just happens to be EA's Chief Operating Officer, and it will be EA who would be publishing the game.

By the way guys, BF3 isn't slated for this year. At earliest it's Q2 next year.

Edit: Misread the quote. Yeah, this game hasn't been officially announced yet and probably won't be for a long time.

Spyder6052 · 13th June 2009, 10:12 AM

going by how long 1.5 patch is taking, we might see bf3 released on bf2's 10 year anniversary.....

i hope they finish the game before releasing it

mecka · 14th June 2009, 1:35 PM

Bring it.

So long as there aren't game breaking bugs in there like C4 throwing and nade spam then I am willing to stomach a few bugs here and there.

Every online game has bugs - time to get over the fact.

12th June 2009, 4:46 PM	#17
CordlezToaster Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Your Mums Bed Posts: 3,859	great another fuckup __________________ Playing online games?, Want some Company? Come Join us Join us as a member (Social or Competitive) @ www.deathinc.com.au

12th June 2009, 4:56 PM	#18
TXN Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: N/A Posts: 1,457	Eh, quit with the negativity. Only one way to find out which way this is going. __________________ Does the set of all sets that do not contain themselves contain itself? 28 successful trades

12th June 2009, 11:52 PM	#25
zaneus Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Wagga Wagga, NSW Posts: 483	1943 is a 3 map, 3 class demo of the frostbite engine. It's not a full game so it shouldn't be treated as such. BC2 and BF3 will be the real "games" for this engine. I have high hopes, should be fun none the less. The rego of BF2 isn't TOO bad once you get used to it. Plus you can blame all your deaths on terrible rego so you feel a little better __________________ My Rig\|Intel E8500@4.3ghz, 1.28v\|MSI HD 4850\|2x2GB Corsair Dominator\|Gigabyte P45-DS3\|CM690\|Corsair HX-620\|1.64TB 28 Trades\|Total: $3863

13th June 2009, 10:12 AM	#29
Spyder6052 Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Karama ghetto NT Posts: 554	going by how long 1.5 patch is taking, we might see bf3 released on bf2's 10 year anniversary..... i hope they finish the game before releasing it __________________ bf2 name: {=NSOF=}aussiepope www.nsofgaming.com cmstacker club member47 system specs:i7 950,X58A-UDR3,gtx570OC,12gig ddr3 1600 ram ,74gWD raptor hdd,600g seagate hdd,

12th June 2009, 8:05 PM	#21
C0ncrete Member Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Perth, WA Posts: 1,573	Is DICE Swedan the good DICE or the bad DICE? I can't remember.

12th June 2009, 9:25 PM	#23
mAJORD Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Griffin , Brisbane Posts: 6,727	weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

14th June 2009, 1:35 PM	#30
mecka Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: melburn Posts: 2,102	Bring it. So long as there aren't game breaking bugs in there like C4 throwing and nade spam then I am willing to stomach a few bugs here and there. Every online game has bugs - time to get over the fact.