Overclockers Australia Forums
OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors  

Go Back   Overclockers Australia Forums > Specific Hardware Topics > Storage & Backup

Notices


Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!
Search our forums with Google:
Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 13th November 2009, 1:54 PM   #1
driver Thread Starter
Member
 
driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Brisbane - Northside
Posts: 3,516
Default Server with lots of Raid HDDs vs. dedicated NAS boxes

Greetings.

I'm looking for a storage ideas for semi-offsite* backup solution, in the range of ~8-10TB.

Standalone NAS boxes, don't reallly seem any cheaper than buying a normal server and running the likes of FreeNAS, when it comes to these sizes.

Am I missing something? Pros / Cons?


(*in a different building on the other side of the property)
driver is offline   Reply With Quote

Join OCAU to remove this ad!
Old 13th November 2009, 2:06 PM   #2
noobmastery
Member
 
noobmastery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 887
Default

A pre-made NAS box has the advantage of being relatively compact and simple compared to a full server.
A full server will offer you more expansion capabilities and speed.
noobmastery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 1:40 PM   #3
Aetherone
Member
 
Aetherone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 6,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noobmastery View Post
A pre-made NAS box has the advantage of being relatively compact and simple compared to a full server.
A full server will offer you more expansion capabilities and speed.
Pretty much my thoughts, with the added - NAS is likely to be much lower power per TB and server far more versatile.
Aetherone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 1:48 PM   #4
noobmastery
Member
 
noobmastery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aetherone View Post
Pretty much my thoughts, with the added - NAS is likely to be much lower power per TB and server far more versatile.
Typically that's probably true
Though if power is a bigger issue than speed you could get an atom setup with gigabit LAN and 4 SATA ports then add a SATA card in the PCI slot.
This could easily give you a total of 8 SATA ports (more if you use a PCI-X card or find a PCIe board) and the main factor in power consumption is the efficiency of your PSU
noobmastery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 1:50 PM   #5
192.168.0.1
Member
 
192.168.0.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 1,398
Default

I believe this is quite good value

http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?...ducts_id=11854

The feature list is quite extensive
__________________
"Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes."
192.168.0.1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 3:12 PM   #6
rowan194
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,872
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 192.168.0.1 View Post
I believe this is quite good value

http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?...ducts_id=11854

The feature list is quite extensive
Check out some reviews - it's so slow that having a gigabit port is almost a useless feature...
rowan194 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 3:21 PM   #7
mitsimonsta
Member
 
mitsimonsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Starfleet HQ, 2194
Posts: 10,004
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 192.168.0.1 View Post
I believe this is quite good value
Fail. $1700+ for a 4-bay NAS? Ouch.

Try http://www.pccasegear.com/index.php?...ducts_id=11954

1) Cheaper

2) Another two drive bays

3) Does RAID6

4) Full AD support

5) Online RAID Migration

6) iSCSI targets

I will also give you the heads up that QNAP units tend to have the fastest read-write speeds of any other NAS brand on the market. Synology is a close second.

Most NAS units have some sort of RSync capability too - perfect for running either a batched backup or running a near-realtime slave array. I use it all the time and works a treat.

You can get a Thecus N7700 for similar money as the QNAP TS-639 which is 7 bays. After that you are looking at $2500+ for a TS-809.

Most vendors have a rackmount version too - Thecus has the N8800 (8 bay, 2RU), and then QNAP has their TS-8089-RU which is 8 bays, 2RU also.
__________________
Opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others. All rights reserved, some wrongs still available
OCAU Folding Hall of Fame Inductee | 55 Million F@H Points for OCAU | 600K PPW Club | Folding Stats
[TOG] Black Ops Server Admin - Over 25 and enjoy gaming? Join TOG
Are you an OCAU Wet Shaver? Visit Paste & Cut
mitsimonsta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 3:27 PM   #8
192.168.0.1
Member
 
192.168.0.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 1,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitsimonsta View Post
Fail. $1700+ for a 4-bay NAS? Ouch.
This has 8TB worth of HDDs in it.. The one you linked was empty yeh?
__________________
"Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes."
192.168.0.1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 3:32 PM   #9
mitsimonsta
Member
 
mitsimonsta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Starfleet HQ, 2194
Posts: 10,004
Default

Oh, it was loaded? Makes a slight difference then.

You will often find that the loaded NASes have some pretty expensive hard disks in them - better value can be had.
__________________
Opinions expressed are my own, and generally unpopular with others. All rights reserved, some wrongs still available
OCAU Folding Hall of Fame Inductee | 55 Million F@H Points for OCAU | 600K PPW Club | Folding Stats
[TOG] Black Ops Server Admin - Over 25 and enjoy gaming? Join TOG
Are you an OCAU Wet Shaver? Visit Paste & Cut
mitsimonsta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 3:35 PM   #10
192.168.0.1
Member
 
192.168.0.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 1,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitsimonsta View Post
Oh, it was loaded? Makes a slight difference then.

You will often find that the loaded NASes have some pretty expensive hard disks in them - better value can be had.
Well at first glance i was like oh 8TB (wanking motion) of capacity but then i checked the WD website and it seems that this is loaded with 4 x 2TB drives. For $1700 i think this is quite good value.
__________________
"Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes."
192.168.0.1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 3:44 PM   #11
noobmastery
Member
 
noobmastery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 192.168.0.1 View Post
Well at first glance i was like oh 8TB (wanking motion) of capacity but then i checked the WD website and it seems that this is loaded with 4 x 2TB drives. For $1700 i think this is quite good value.
True you've got just shy of a grand worth of drives there
Better value could be had building a small server though
noobmastery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 4:48 PM   #12
192.168.0.1
Member
 
192.168.0.1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Wollongong
Posts: 1,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noobmastery View Post
True you've got just shy of a grand worth of drives there
Better value could be had building a small server though
This is true, but for pretty much everyone else apart from adapet users. This is pretty well priced compared to what you could build. I know there is alot out their to be had for $1700. But if you just wanted something that worked out of the box, i think this is pretty good. No way would i get it, ZFS and 10TB all the way
__________________
"Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes."
192.168.0.1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 6:04 PM   #13
Aetherone
Member
 
Aetherone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 6,239
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 192.168.0.1 View Post
For $1700 i think this is quite good value.
Given the typically abysmal performance of this unit, value might be too strong a word.
Aetherone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th November 2009, 10:47 PM   #14
MetalPhreak
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 1,735
Default

SATA connectors
http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/125962/C...o/RPC-2008.asp
http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/125968/C...o/RPC-3116.asp

SFF SAS connectors
http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/125963/C...o/RPC-2208.asp
http://www.techbuy.com.au/p/125969/C...o/RPC-3216.asp

Any one of those plus some basic cpu/mobo/ram/raid controller would give you heaps of room for drives (for now and the future).
MetalPhreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2009, 8:43 AM   #15
phreeky82
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Townsville
Posts: 9,097
Default

Is this actually a backup solution? 8TB of backup capacity, that's crazy. Or would I be right in guessing that it's not actually a backup solution, but a central storage solution?

If it's backup, I don't see why you would use RAID.
__________________
Successful trades: eyusuf, andy8, stuartl, michaeliam, theDarkHorse, bob
phreeky82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
internal, nas, server, storage

Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away!

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +10. The time now is 3:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd. -
OCAU is not responsible for the content of individual messages posted by others.
Other content copyright Overclockers Australia.
OCAU is hosted by Internode!