Music player for windows that handles 60000+ songs.

dmandn · 7th April 2010, 10:32 AM

Is there a music player for windows that handles 60000+ songs in a single playlist or can load that many into a single playlist at a time?

NSanity · 7th April 2010, 10:46 AM

foobar.

mr_mordred2095 · 7th April 2010, 11:03 AM

Winamp

Edit: just loaded 200,000 into mine now

dmandn · 7th April 2010, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr_mordred2095

Winamp

Winamp only loads a maximum of 34344 songs at a time, and I just tried its new version, it crashes at startup :S.

Been with winamp a long time, like its interface but its getting too bloated.

mr_mordred2095 · 7th April 2010, 11:15 AM

Using classic interface. I beg to differ my friend

Click to view full-sized image!
Hosted by UGBox Image Store

0% CPU usage on my C2D @ 3.66ghz while playing a 320kb mp3.

mr_psi · 7th April 2010, 11:19 AM

foobar. nothing else.

proffesso · 7th April 2010, 11:25 AM

itunes?

and why a single playlist? 60,000 songs will take a few years to listen to in one go (playlist)

jambo. · 7th April 2010, 11:35 AM

iTunes?

Are you kidding

Foobar2000 all the way!

proffesso · 7th April 2010, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jambo.

iTunes?

Are you kidding

Foobar2000 all the way!

itunes is a bad choice? it handles hundreds of thousands no problems.

jambo. · 7th April 2010, 11:56 AM

I can't even imagine adding 60,000 songs to iTunes all at once. It'd spend half a day finding the files, determining gapless playback and getting the album art.

bojo · 7th April 2010, 12:00 PM

vanilla foobar should work.

Foobar generally seems to be quite flexible in whatever craziness your trying to do with it

.

JoKaH · 7th April 2010, 12:07 PM

foobar2000 all the way!

Its lightweight
Has low ram footprint and is one hell of a player!

With its many plugins/addons & skin you can import songs to your ipod and make it as customizable as any other mp3 player.

Its the mediaplayer classic for music files imo

Oblong Cheese · 7th April 2010, 1:15 PM

The people I know with several terabyte music collections swear by foobar2000.

Drubbing · 7th April 2010, 2:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jambo.

I can't even imagine adding 60,000 songs to iTunes all at once. It'd spend half a day finding the files, determining gapless playback and getting the album art.

maybe, in Windows...

Akh-Horus · 7th April 2010, 5:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Drubbing

maybe, in Windows...

In any OS I would imagine!

7th April 2010, 10:32 AM	#1
dmandn Member Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Western Australia Posts: 1,878	Music player for windows that handles 60000+ songs. Is there a music player for windows that handles 60000+ songs in a single playlist or can load that many into a single playlist at a time? __________________ Main System: AMD FX-8120, Asus Crosshair IV Formula, 2x 4Gb Crucial Ballixtix ddr3 1866 ram, Asus 6970 DCuII. ASUS Owners Club

7th April 2010, 10:46 AM	#2
NSanity Member Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Bathurst, NSW Posts: 6,843	foobar. __________________ Intel i7-3770k @ stock \| Asus P8Z77 WS \| 32GB Corsair Vengeance 1866 10-11-10-30 \| 2x EVGA GTX670 SLI FTW @ stock \| 1x Dell U3011 \| OCZ Revodrive3 X2 MAXIOPS 480GB \| Western Digital 2TB Caviar Black \| Asus Essence STX \| Audio-Technica ATH-AD900 \| Antec HCP-1200 \| Enermax Fulmo GT Midtower \| Synology DS2411+ NAS \| 12x Seagate 2TB 7200.12 i'm in your noun, verbing your related noun.

7th April 2010, 11:19 AM	#6
mr_psi Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Perth Posts: 12	foobar. nothing else. __________________ This is Grade A 100% pure Columbian cocaine, ladies and gentlemen... Disco shit...

7th April 2010, 11:25 AM	#7
proffesso Member Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Watsonia, Melbourne Posts: 8,618	itunes? and why a single playlist? 60,000 songs will take a few years to listen to in one go (playlist) __________________ If at first you don't succeed, remove all evidence you ever tried.

7th April 2010, 1:15 PM	#13
Oblong Cheese Member Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Brisbane Posts: 9,833	The people I know with several terabyte music collections swear by foobar2000. __________________ My Website \| My Computers \| Grado Labs Alessandro MS-1, Shure SRH-840, Topping TP30

7th April 2010, 11:03 AM	#3
mr_mordred2095 Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Brisbane Posts: 3,590	Winamp Edit: just loaded 200,000 into mine now

7th April 2010, 11:15 AM	#5
mr_mordred2095 Member Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Brisbane Posts: 3,590	Using classic interface. I beg to differ my friend Click to view full-sized image! Hosted by UGBox Image Store 0% CPU usage on my C2D @ 3.66ghz while playing a 320kb mp3.

7th April 2010, 11:35 AM	#8
jambo. Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Adelaide Posts: 38	iTunes? Are you kidding Foobar2000 all the way!

7th April 2010, 11:56 AM	#10
jambo. Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Adelaide Posts: 38	I can't even imagine adding 60,000 songs to iTunes all at once. It'd spend half a day finding the files, determining gapless playback and getting the album art.

7th April 2010, 12:00 PM	#11
bojo Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 1,880	vanilla foobar should work. Foobar generally seems to be quite flexible in whatever craziness your trying to do with it .

7th April 2010, 12:07 PM	#12
JoKaH Member Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Sydney Posts: 161	foobar2000 all the way! Its lightweight Has low ram footprint and is one hell of a player! With its many plugins/addons & skin you can import songs to your ipod and make it as customizable as any other mp3 player. Its the mediaplayer classic for music files imo