![]() |
![]() OCAU News - Wiki - QuickLinks - Pix - Sponsors |
|
|||||||
| Notices |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! Search our forums with Google: |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#2071 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 829
|
__________________
PC: Intel i7 4770K @ 4.2GHz (still tweaking) with Corsair H110, MSI Z87 Mpower Max, 16GB G.Skill Trident 2400MHz @ 10-12-12-31-2T, EVGA Nvidia GTX 680 Signature 2, OCZ Samsung 840 Pro 256GBGB, 2TB WD Black, ASUS PB278Q 27" IPS, Corsair HX-1000 Watt PSU, Windows 8 Pro 64-bit. Trades: Lots
|
|
|
|
| Join OCAU to remove this ad! |
|
|
#2072 |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2073 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bonny Scotland
Posts: 1,929
|
Damn straight!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2074 |
|
(Taking a Break)
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 393
|
GTX 570 is the new GTX 580 >.>
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2075 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 10,787
|
Quote:
That thing overclocked like a mother fucker. Yet it was a dual-GPU card
__________________
TOX enables me ^_^ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2076 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NSW
Posts: 6,526
|
it just means the 5970 was over engineered. which is good for us but bad for ati.
__________________
Democracy's greatest trick was convincing man he was informed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2077 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 10,787
|
Quote:
(this is going OT, but I was using the previous post to make a point... AMD engineered their 5000-series much better than NVIDIA did, which in turn positioned them in the market much better for dual-GPU based tech).
__________________
TOX enables me ^_^ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2078 | |
|
is a dad at last :D
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Mt Martha,Victoria,Oz
Posts: 8,748
|
You missed my valid point entirely Anthony.
The 590 is engineered to a standard that matches the 5970. The 5970 did not have two power hungry Fermi GPU's on it's PCB. Therefore the 5970 could have power regulation circuitry that didn't need to be an overkill, the 5970 was also a good overclocker due to the energy efficient design of Cypress, it had nothing to do with quality of construction of the card nor did it have anything to do with the componentry on the PCB. The 590 runs fine at default clocks and moderate overclocks provided NV's voltage limitations are adhered to and temperatures are kept under control - Adding more rugged voltage regulation circuitry would obviously have added to the retail cost of the card thereby pricing it out of the market, the two 8 pin pci-e connectors would also have become the limiting factor. If you in any way thought a dual Fermi card was going to overclock like crazy, honestly, you were dreaming - It's just not going to happen, and never was going to happen. To requote myself: Quote:
__________________
Show us yer HTPC! 2700k @ 5ghz, 8GB Corsair Vengeance C8, ASUS Maximus IV Extreme Z, 2 x EVGA 670FTW @ 1231/3420, Sandisk 128GB Extreme SSD, OCZ 60GB Vertex 2, 5TB WD green storage, 3 x Acer V243HQ in Surround, 1 x Acer AL718 4th accessory display, Windows 7 Ultimate, Corsair H100, Heavily modded Zalman GS1000. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2079 |
|
(Banned or Deleted)
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Up to my nuts in PC guts!
Posts: 122
|
Wow Fluid, do you work for nVidia? You would think so with the amount of passion in your posts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2080 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 10,787
|
I won't even go into that argument flu!d (you and your arguments/me getting banned constantly with you getting away with it) was the main reason I've stayed away from OCAU for a while.
But, didn't you defend quite proudly I might add, that the Fermi architecture was superior? The 590 is engineered to match the 5970 that is nearly TWO YEARS OLD?? Because of the failures that have plagued Fermi, it is not designed to have dual-GPU without it's issues, NVIDIA did it anyway and look at the teething issues it's having.
__________________
TOX enables me ^_^ |
|
|
|
|
|
#2081 |
|
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Melb, CBD
Posts: 8,805
|
WOW and no TDP talk yet
__________________
CORSAIR 350D WINDOWED - 3570K/PHANTEK - ASUS Z68 GENE IV - EVGA GTX 680 FTW 4GB - AVEXIR 16GB 2133MHZ - U2711 - SHURE SRH940/BEYERS DT880 PRO 250-OHMS - FILCO/PBT POKER
DIABLO 3 ACCOUNT |
|
|
|
|
|
#2082 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 10,787
|
Quote:
hahaha I think that argument is dead, there's no coming back from that! TDP arguments are now closed, or blowing up like the 590's :P
__________________
TOX enables me ^_^ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2083 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 799
|
Quote:
__________________
i7 980x @ 4.4GHz – Corsair H100 - Asus RE3 - Gainward GeForce GTX 580 3GB Phantom SLI - Corsair Vengeance 1600 MHz CL9 12gig - Enermax Revo 1250w - Intel 160Gb SSD - OCZ 240Gb Vertex 3 SSD - X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro – Acer HN274H 27 inch 3D Monitor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2084 |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Benowa, Gold Coast
Posts: 1,535
|
I'm still waiting on being able to send the GTX 570 back to OTA.
![]() 2 days to get me an RA number. ------ Genuine question here: The GTX590 is dual underclocked GTX580's right? The 6990 is dual underclocked 6970's right? Ignoring heat and fan noise - if an overclocker wanted to - can you push the GTX590 up to the same clocks and voltages you could push two GTX580's? Ignoring heat and fan noise - if an overclocker wanted to - can you push the 6990 up to the same clocks and voltages you could push two 6970's?
__________________
My signature was here. Last edited by meremortal; 6th April 2011 at 1:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2085 |
|
Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Adelaide
Posts: 10,787
|
__________________
TOX enables me ^_^ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| 550, 560, 560ti, 570, 580, 590, cuda, geforce, gtx, nvidia, physx, ti |
|
Sign up for a free OCAU account and this ad will go away! |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|