10th gen Intel Desktop Comet Lake CPU(i9 10900K, i7 10700K, i5 10600K, i3 10320 & Z490)

Discussion in 'Intel x86 CPUs and chipsets' started by Azzan, Dec 30, 2019.

  1. mAJORD

    mAJORD Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2002
    Messages:
    11,429
    Location:
    Griffin , Brisbane
    well a 9900K has 8 vs 10 cores so of course It's drawing more power.
     
  2. Zarok77

    Zarok77 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 2, 2020
    Messages:
    916
    It looks like atm the motherboard are more interesting than the 10th CPU's
     
    DarkSnipa, zoki_007 and OJR like this.
  3. cbwolf

    cbwolf Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2001
    Messages:
    2,751
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Yes, but at that voltage with the same cooling setup a 9900k will be running at 65 - 70c. For essentially the same chip, with +2 cores and a thinner die to be 20 - 30c hotter than that simply means something is wrong with the cooler, the ambient in the test room was like 40c or it's clickbait.

    I know that this thread is essentially the 10900k hate train - but those numbers don't stack up.
     
  4. OJR

    OJR Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    4,928
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Let’s just wait and see, shall we?
     
  5. jpw007

    jpw007 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    4,853
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Na, let's just say it's shit now and keep doing so :lol:
     
    OJR, combatant3219 and zoki_007 like this.
  6. shane41

    shane41 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    6,824
    Location:
    dice que no sabe
    What up with you matey :confused: I remember you were a youngster doing OC. :tongue: Only person stops you doing overclocking is you.
    Macsbeach + bullants legends you know both doing OC. Warp9 team many guys +60 age all doing OC on low cost hardware.

    Not looking site CBF'd. Does not sound right on the cooling.
    If I reference my 6core 8086K vs 8core 9900KS in 3D benches 5.4Ghz. I expect the temp difference is about 10c on load.
     
  7. walker_2003

    walker_2003 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,731
    Location:
    Canberra
  8. spit051261

    spit051261 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2019
    Messages:
    2,809
    Location:
    Perth
    I'm going for an Apex XII and the new chip.
    Got to give it a go and see if it's better than a 9900ks .
    Seems strange you have to buy the board a while before chip is released :confused:
     
    Last edited: May 13, 2020
    Zarok77 likes this.
  9. jjjc_93

    jjjc_93 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2009
    Messages:
    2,898
    Location:
    Perth
    I don't really have the inclination to jump back in mate, just an observation of the cost of playing at the pointy end of enthusiast hw these days. I always did love me a good whinge :lol:
     
  10. Bullants

    Bullants Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2009
    Messages:
    1,766
    Location:
    Australia
    Hey Jack :thumbup:

    As regarding the thread, I just seen ple has put up pre order of 10th gen chips 10900kf $899 and the 10900k $999...22 this month
     
    jjjc_93 likes this.
  11. DarkSnipa

    DarkSnipa Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2017
    Messages:
    825
    Location:
    Perth
    WTF 429 for a 10600KF and 479 for a 10600K no thanks, I bought a brand new 9700K for less than this off the forum not that long ago... :mad: I will report back Taobao's OEM chip pricing and see what it is like over there.

    10900K for 949 after discount, this toy is just too expensive with too little gain :(

    Edit: No 10th Gen OEM chip listings on Taobao atm...
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2020
  12. adamsleath

    adamsleath Member

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2006
    Messages:
    18,919
    Location:
    Sunnybank Q 4109
    looks about right for price.
    https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...600kf-processor-12m-cache-up-to-4-80-ghz.html
    recommended customer price :237 usd
    X 1.6 usd/aud conversion + 10%ish gets you the price in aud...basically.

    9700k isnt hyperthreaded. and yet labelled an i7 . annoying.

    z490 boards. midrange are over 300aud. but seriously who spends 1000's on a motherboard? it's crazy shit. :lol:
    but the price on the 6/12 offering is not too shabby. considering what the prices on the 8700k were.

    https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0600k-processor-12m-cache-up-to-4-80-ghz.html
    460+aud, 10600k. not too shabby at all.

    10900k
    https://ark.intel.com/content/www/u...0900k-processor-20m-cache-up-to-5-30-ghz.html
    488usd

    i bet they tout supply issues in the states to gouge pricing. on the 10900k in particular. the new king of swing .
    thats 860aud if you do the conversion. but it'll be price gouged to death. and sit on top of the 3900x 12c/24t in performance? not sure.
    ===
    the performance of their new 8/16 chip will be interesting to see.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2020
    zoki_007 likes this.
  13. nCrypt

    nCrypt Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,272
    Location:
    Melbourne
    wheres the i3 chips dammit! so keen to see their new i3's vs the Ryzen 3 - 4c/8t is what i what to know!
     
  14. walker_2003

    walker_2003 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    12,731
    Location:
    Canberra
    999 for 90+ degree temps under high end cooling humm..

    Id certainly wait for ryzen 4000 before committing to these.

    8700k doing me fine for gaming, though it's sad that my new laptop has more Cores then it (4800H)
     
  15. OJR

    OJR Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    4,928
    Location:
    Melbourne
    As expected, prices are rubbish considering what you get. Another nail in Intel's consumer CPU coffin.
     
  16. dasa2

    dasa2 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2003
    Messages:
    839
    Location:
    Northern VIC
    3600 $299 vs 10400F\ $299-339 <3 runs on the same system two at 2133 one at 3600c18
    AMD ~0-6% faster
    https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-5-3600-vs-Intel-Core-i5-10400/4040vs4073

    3700X $529 vs 10600KF\K $449\499 <Decent system 3600c18 RAM
    Intel 8-10% faster up to 4 cores
    AMD 4% faster at 8 cores and 26% faster with multithreading.
    https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-3700X-vs-Intel-Core-i5-10600K/4043vs4072

    3700X $529 vs 10700KF\K $699\749 <HP system
    Intel 3-15% Faster
    https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-7-3700X-vs-Intel-Core-i7-10700K/4043vs4070

    3900X $779 vs 10900KF\K $899\999 <A Decent system with 3600c18 RAM and another with 2400
    Intel 14-18% faster 1-8 threads
    AMD 3% faster MT
    https://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/AMD-Ryzen-9-3900X-vs-Intel-Core-i9-10900K/4044vs4071
    3950X $1299 is the same but 36% faster MT.

    I know userbenchmark has some BS on there sites but these % numbers above should be accurate despite that.
    If anything they show AMD in a more favorable light as the benchmark is not overly sensitive to latency although it still sees a bigger change from core\memory latency than Cinebench.
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2020
  17. OJR

    OJR Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    4,928
    Location:
    Melbourne
    How are you getting performance numbers before launch?

    While we're at it, where are you getting KF prices from?
     
    Last edited: May 14, 2020
  18. zoki_007

    zoki_007 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,132
    Location:
    Sydney
    When can we expect reviews/benchmarks? Are we waiting for NDA to be lifted or something?
     
  19. mAJORD

    mAJORD Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2002
    Messages:
    11,429
    Location:
    Griffin , Brisbane

    user benchmark.. nuff said

    if A 4.4/4.7Ghz 8700K is slower MT, and only a smidgen faster (single digit %) ST than a Ryzen 3600 , how is a 4.0/4.3Ghz 10400 going to keep up?
     
  20. OJR

    OJR Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    4,928
    Location:
    Melbourne
    It's a pity... it looks like ol mate put so much effort into that post too.
     

Share This Page

Advertisement: