Best camera for teachers?

Discussion in 'Photography & Video' started by MickybD, Oct 14, 2019.

  1. MickybD

    MickybD Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    588
    Location:
    Adelaide
    Hi all.

    I am seeking recommendations for the best camera to buy for primary school teachers.

    I'm now working as the business manager in a small Primary School. My role is quite diverse and I've enjoyed many opportunities to use my photography skills at school events. However, I can't be at everything (and ideally would spend less time on photography, as much as I enjoy it), and so we also need to rely on our teachers to take photos. I have lifted the standard of our photography, but that has also served to highlight the gap between good photos and those generally taken by our teachers. Our Principal is keen for the general standard to be lifted, and so I will be running a little photography workshop to talk about some basics in composition, lighting, shutter speeds etc.

    We'd also like to invest in some better cameras. Our current cameras are basic tiny sensor older compact cameras that don't cope well in low light. So, I am seeking recommendations for new cameras.

    I'm thinking something with a larger sensor - perhaps a 1" sensor at least, but ideally a 4/3 would be good. The bigger the better! Don't care about megapixels. I'd love to see our teachers shooting in raw, but that's not practical, so something that going to produce good jpgs out of the box would be good. My Sony A7 III has "Fast, Faster" (etc) settings for shutter speed when using auto-ISO (ie it can be set to choose shutter speeds fast than simply 1/focal length), and I reckon something like that would be good if it's available in a compact camera to help minimise motion blur in lower light.

    Any recommendations?
     
  2. 2SHY

    2SHY Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Messages:
    7,624
    Location:
    Sydney NSW Australia
    What is your budget ?
     
  3. OP
    OP
    MickybD

    MickybD Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    588
    Location:
    Adelaide
    Sadly, as little as possible... We have a tight budget. :( But, I want to get something that will do that job well. No point getting another second-rate option that will produce the same dodgy pics. (I realise, of course, that most of the issues will be with the people using the tool not the tool itself, but if we can get a good tool then I can work on educating the users.) I want to get recommendations for makes/models and then I'll consider the price. A bit backwards for a business manager I know, but I am keen to know what it will cost us to get what I ideally would like. We're not talking Leica though! Recommend away and I'll consider all recommendations.
     
  4. power

    power Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2002
    Messages:
    60,221
    Location:
    brisbane
    just get an entry level DSLR with the kit lens.

    used can be had for peanuts.
     
  5. guy.incogneto

    guy.incogneto Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2007
    Messages:
    6,047
    Location:
    Melbourne
    A Sony RX100 model in your price range will do a good job. They have the simplicity and compactness of point and shoot Cameras, but have a larger sensor, fast autofocus, good quality zoom lens and great in low light/indoors without needing flash.

    IMO, No point going for a big clunky SLR with a terrible kit lens, and no one will know how to use to get the best out of it.
     
  6. 2SHY

    2SHY Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2010
    Messages:
    7,624
    Location:
    Sydney NSW Australia
  7. OP
    OP
    MickybD

    MickybD Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2008
    Messages:
    588
    Location:
    Adelaide
    Thanks. That's certainly a good option for quality, but I should have specified that compactness will be important, as these cameras will need to be easily taken on excursions etc.

    Thanks. Yes, I was going to look at the RX100, as I wondered if it has the same auto-ISO options as the A7III.
     
  8. TheBear21

    TheBear21 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,505
    Location:
    Central QLD
    Another vote for the RX100.

    We all know a DSLR will give the best results in the right hands. But these are not the right hands. A point n shoot will be your best bet.
     
  9. ArmoureD

    ArmoureD Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2002
    Messages:
    634
    Location:
    Earth
    Canon g7x mk2 or mk3...
     
  10. theicemagic

    theicemagic Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2001
    Messages:
    3,943
    Location:
    Melbourne, Australia
    My wife was a teacher before we had a baby, and I can honestly say that despite all your teaching, most of the teachers won't be interested in the technical aspects, short of telling them the differences in modes most will find the mode they like and stick with it. I'd stick to telling them to stick to Tv mode for almost everything, and letting the camera work out the rest for them.

    I see lots of recommendations for the RX100, but I'd steer clear of that for several reasons. It's not a camera that's designed for the average person, it was from the outset for pro's who can't carry their pro gear somewhere, and sony's menu systems are still atrocious and difficult to understand including their clunky touch interfaces on their new cameras... This is coming from a Sony/Canon/P1 user. You won't always be there to help the teachers get out of a sticky situation.
    Finally, they're incredibly expensive really for what is ultimately a point and shoot.

    I'd also steer clear from entry level DSLR's too, while it'll allow some of the more capable users the opportunity to work a little harder for the right image, most of the people will be intimidated by it, and won't like the view finder (we're in the age of mobile phones), that said, mirror less isn't necessarily a bad thing. I'd say look at the Canon mirror less range, simply because they have by far one of the most intuitive menu experiences, and they actually respond nicely. It'll still allow for the more capable photographers to shoot really well, but doesn't need a different lens if you're shooting normal stuff. For 649 from JBHifi, it comes with the kit lens and leaves change when compared to every RX100 except the first gen.

    Having an RX100 (original) and my wifes Canon M3, I'd prefer the m3 any day of the week for photographs.

    If compact, I'm with ArmoureD, the G7X series.
     
  11. cvidler

    cvidler Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    12,590
    Location:
    Canberra
    out of box idea here. but modern phones will take just as good a picture as the fancy camera in the hands of a noob.

    and unless you (as the resident expert) want to provide support to everyone forever more (for free), leave them with their phones.
     
  12. miicah

    miicah Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2010
    Messages:
    6,505
    Location:
    Brisbane, QLD
    Big issues with teachers taking photos of students on their phones. Considering most people have auto-upload to cloud services turned on, it becomes another layer of problems, as (at least in QLD) storing images/data about students on non-approved cloud providers is a huge no-no
     
  13. cvidler

    cvidler Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2001
    Messages:
    12,590
    Location:
    Canberra
    Good point, I hadn't considered that.

    My point however was, OP is gonna end up with a lot of extra work, supporting everyone with no passion for photography for the same quality that you get now from them.

    buy whatever cheap P&S that's somewhat rugged for them.
     
  14. Raptor_Eye

    Raptor_Eye Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Messages:
    2,407
    Location:
    Bathurst NSW
    I'm far from an expert, but would not Mirror less based Camera's make a lot of sense for this? e.g. Canon M50 (which i have)

    Not too big and heavy, not expensive, takes good photo's and you can get a large lens if you wish, plus you can of course shoot in raw if you so wish.
     
    theicemagic likes this.

Share This Page

Advertisement: