1. OCAU Merchandise is available! Check out our 20th Anniversary Mugs, Classic Logo Shirts and much more! Discussion in this thread.
    Dismiss Notice

Cold fusion reactor independently verified

Discussion in 'Science' started by Doc-of-FC, May 22, 2013.

  1. Doc-of-FC

    Doc-of-FC Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    3,396
    Location:
    Canberra
  2. RyoSaeba

    RyoSaeba Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2001
    Messages:
    13,392
    Location:
    Perth
    Very interesting read. If it's true, then we can convert nickle+hydrogen into copper, produce a whole bunch of energy to use as power, and then also getting copper back as a sell-able commodity. That's a fantastic outcome. :thumbup:
     
  3. OldMate

    OldMate Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,422
    Location:
    Northern Beaches SYD
    Now that's cool. Really cool.
    Hopefully they work out how to make it even more efficient and start producing power, and the greenies don't find something wrong with it.
     
  4. Badger

    Badger Caveat lector

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    9,746
    Location:
    Adelaide, SA
  5. [PnP]dredd

    [PnP]dredd Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2001
    Messages:
    478
    Location:
    Canberra
    I hope that this is real, but I have my doubts.

    In particular, the test was conducted at the premises of Rossi's business. I would want to see this device moved to an independant laboratory to remove the opportunity for manipulation.

    The draft paper says that:

    In the March test, about 62 net kWh were produced, with a consumption of
    about 33 kWh.... In the December test, about 160 net kWh were produced, with a consumption of 35 kWh.
     
  6. [PnP]dredd

    [PnP]dredd Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2001
    Messages:
    478
    Location:
    Canberra
    I think that claim refers to previous tests. This one appears to be an independant test conducted by researchers from European Universities. It should be fairly easy for journos to check their credentials and whether they actually authored the draft paper which describes the tests (linked in previous post).

    This appears to be similar to the faster-than-light paper from a while ago - proper scientists observing something they can't explain and putting it out there for the broader community to peer review and discuss. In that case, the observed effect was not real (damaged cable I think?).
     
  7. oculi

    oculi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    11,930
    pretty simple to test this thing without the risk of finding out what his magic "secret sauce" is, define your boundary, meaure energy going in and energy coming out. i don't care what is going on inside the sealed metal tube as thermodynamics doesn't get bogged down in that kind of irrelevant detail.
     
  8. [PnP]dredd

    [PnP]dredd Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2001
    Messages:
    478
    Location:
    Canberra
  9. Badger

    Badger Caveat lector

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2002
    Messages:
    9,746
    Location:
    Adelaide, SA
    As noted above, the test was done in Rossi's premises, not completely independent.
     
  10. oculi

    oculi Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2004
    Messages:
    11,930
  11. [PnP]dredd

    [PnP]dredd Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2001
    Messages:
    478
    Location:
    Canberra
    Actually, you are completely correct. Apologies for posting that without reading it more thouroughly.
     
  12. antipody

    antipody Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2001
    Messages:
    5,039
    Location:
    Small World
  13. twisar

    twisar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    3,122
    I look forward to a brave new future where energy is practically free, naturally we have enough nickel for the whole world. and enough of the mysterious 'secret sauce'. New Caledonia and Australia owne 1/2 the worlds nickel, we should annex NC and then sell the mineral rights to Gina, we wont tax her thought, that'd be unfair.

    I'm sceptical but lack sufficient sciency stuff in my brain to refute it.
     
  14. Dopefish

    Dopefish Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    2,851
    Location:
    State of confusion
    I think france would be a little bit annoyed
     
  15. RobRoySyd

    RobRoySyd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    8,251
    Location:
    Sydney
    Interesting thread in that I learned something, it isn't all that hard to do fusion at home. OK, that's not going to let you power anything but still your own Fusor has got to be pretty darn cool.
     
  16. antipody

    antipody Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2001
    Messages:
    5,039
    Location:
    Small World
    Five reasons Cold Fusion is bunk..

    http://news.discovery.com/tech/alternative-power-sources/5-reasons-cold-fusion-bunk-130528.htm

    They're reasonable, but to be fair, nothing in there disproves anything.

    Also an article has recently appeared in Wired....

    http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-05/24/cold-fusion-research

    You'd think, if it was genuine, the tech should have been rolled out much faster than this. I mean, if it's not a hoax, this is the most revolutionary technology perhaps in human history.
     
  17. RobRoySyd

    RobRoySyd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    8,251
    Location:
    Sydney
    Well no.
    The first slide mentions the Coulomb Barrier. My enquiring mind decided to try to understand that better only to learn that according to what we know fusion is also impossible inside our Sun.

    http://www.astro.soton.ac.uk/~pac/PH112/notes/notes/node111.html

    It needs a temperature of 1.6x 1010K which is 1,000 time hotter than the Sun. Even allowing for the energy distribution of the particles we still get the answer of no fusion in the Sun.

    That's what keeps me very firmly believing it's a hoax. The smoke about protecting patent right etc, etc is pure BS. If this is the real deal even without getting a nickel out of licensing your name would be writ large in the history of mankind and no doubt we'd bestow riches beyond their wildest dreams on them anyway.
     
  18. twisar

    twisar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    3,122
    Thats classical physics. The next few pages detail how quantum tunnelling overides the limitations of the Coulomb Barrier. Cold fusion is bunk either way..
     
  19. RobRoySyd

    RobRoySyd Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    8,251
    Location:
    Sydney
    :o Thanks, an interesting read.

    I now understand how fusion happens in a fusor at not too difficult to produce temperatures.
     
  20. Cadbury

    Cadbury Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2004
    Messages:
    4,781
    Location:
    Coogee, WA
    I would like nothing better than apparent quackery like the eCat to be proven valid. Just think of what it would mean to humanity if there really was a clean simple way to generate power as per the eCat claim!
     

Share This Page

Advertisement: