Falcon 9 / Dragon

Discussion in 'Science' started by MoorKhan, Dec 8, 2010.

  1. BlueRaven

    BlueRaven Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    4,016
    Location:
    Sydney
    All I can say is..... awwwww, FUCK YEAH!! :D:thumbup:
    Been a good year for them overall, lets hope they can keep to their cadence in 2018. :thumbup:

    I got smacked down by more knowledgeable parties earlier in the thread for suggesting that Falcon Heavy was in any way "on schedule" as per company tweets...
    but I'm seriously hoping that they get this into space in the next 12 months. Going to be fucking awesome to watch. :D
     
    Last edited: Dec 24, 2017
  2. PabloEscobar

    PabloEscobar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Messages:
    11,478
    Aero braking would ruin the paintwork on the Tesla?

    I still get erect watching Saturn V launches :). bring it back :).
     
  3. Quadbox

    Quadbox Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    5,983
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Did someone say erect... ?

    [​IMG]
     
    MUTMAN likes this.
  4. MUTMAN

    MUTMAN Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    5,051
    Location:
    4109
    is this the one with the car onboard ?
     
  5. Quadbox

    Quadbox Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    5,983
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Yes
     
  6. Sphinx2000

    Sphinx2000 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2001
    Messages:
    5,768
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Don't worry she'll hold together...
     
  7. PabloEscobar

    PabloEscobar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Messages:
    11,478
    It's being heavily talked down, so there's a pretty good chance she won't, and parts of a Tesla Roadster will rain into the ocean.
     
  8. MUTMAN

    MUTMAN Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    5,051
    Location:
    4109
    What's the deal ? They need to launch several tonnes, multiple times to pass some u.s. gov. certification to get more dollars to launch more stuff ?
     
  9. Quadbox

    Quadbox Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    5,983
    Location:
    Brisbane
    High risk flight, unlikely any commercial provider would be willing to take the risk. The second flight scheduled on it is a commercial payload (arabsat) and the third is a USAF certification flight to allow later US defence launches (STP-2, which is a grab-bag of experimental small-medium satellites being launched together)

    EDIT - I'd kinda assumed if they werent shooting to mars, the next obvious "dummy mission" would be to demonstrate direct injection to GEO, cause they havent demonstrated a coast time that long as of yet afaik (~10 hours to the final injection burn from GTO). Which is an important capability for US defence launches, cause the NRO designs a lot of their geostat satellites without an appogee kick motor for some strange reason
     
    Last edited: Dec 31, 2017
    MUTMAN likes this.
  10. PabloEscobar

    PabloEscobar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Messages:
    11,478
  11. evilasdeath

    evilasdeath Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2004
    Messages:
    4,714
    I think it went fine and they report it dead so russia doesnt know

    when is the falcon heavy static test? and launch?
     
  12. Quadbox

    Quadbox Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    5,983
    Location:
    Brisbane
    It sounds like reading between the lines of what a whole bunch of different sources have said, that northrop grumman fucked up. SpaceX usually provide the payload adapter that seperates the spacecraft from the upper stage, for some reason on this occasion northrop grumman supplied it. It appears it failed to seperate and reentered the atmosphere, whether because it was in a very low earth orbit by design, or because it was useless for purpose and so they deorbited it deliberately.

    Hence why spacex say that the falcon 9 performed according to spec, which would otherwise seem incompatible with it not separating.

    If I were to don a tin-foil hat, and assume it was deliberate, it's not outside the realms of possibility it was a hypersonic glide vehicle test. In which case the deorbit could have been deliberate
     
  13. to4garret

    to4garret Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2011
    Messages:
    102
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    hypersonic zoomer?
     
  14. PabloEscobar

    PabloEscobar Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2008
    Messages:
    11,478
    No static fire test today, so here's a Delta IV to tide you over.

     
    MUTMAN likes this.
  15. Sphinx2000

    Sphinx2000 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2001
    Messages:
    5,768
    Location:
    Brisbane
    RnR and MUTMAN like this.
  16. Sphinx2000

    Sphinx2000 Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2001
    Messages:
    5,768
    Location:
    Brisbane
    Falcon Heavy sends a car to Mars

     
  17. RnR

    RnR Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2002
    Messages:
    11,311
    Location:
    Brisbane
    The window starts at 4:30AM AEST tomorrow morning.
     
    MUTMAN likes this.
  18. RnR

    RnR Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2002
    Messages:
    11,311
    Location:
    Brisbane
     
    MUTMAN likes this.
  19. Jacom

    Jacom Member

    Joined:
    May 7, 2002
    Messages:
    895
    Location:
    Geelong, Victoria
    I've seen conflicting times, The launch is at 13:30 EST which is 5:30am AEST? Or have I got my conversion wrong somewhere?
     
  20. RnR

    RnR Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2002
    Messages:
    11,311
    Location:
    Brisbane
    I think the official window start time is 18:30 UTC. Google says that this is 4:30AM Brisbane time AEST, or 5:30AM Sydney time AEDT. I believe the window lasts for 3 hours.
     
    Last edited: Feb 6, 2018

Share This Page