1. If you're receiving a message that you are banned from the Current Events or Politics forums, it's not you specifically: those forums have been hidden for all users. For more info, see here.
    Dismiss Notice

Humanbenchmark- a reference test for all twitch shooters

Discussion in 'PC Games' started by Bourke, Nov 23, 2017.

  1. Zabba

    Zabba Member

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2011
    Messages:
    807
    192 first try

    However, I have been playing FPS for an hour before trying this...warm up maybe?
     
  2. OP
    OP
    Bourke

    Bourke Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2017
    Messages:
    465
    So, the way I see it, if you do a cold first try, it's a true avg reaction time specific to you...what ever it is....then from there you could make changes to your setup to improve on.
    I hope it's not ping dependent, I think it's Java based
    If you try and try, you are kinda priming yourself ready, like what ZABBA said, could be in a heightened state of readiness.

    On netbook cold - 364ms
    Day later on game rig- 296ms

    Then I did a test, click box ready, cursor to right edge of screen and wait for green move and click.

    I'm on a 4k 60hz 31in screen - 696ms

    Why.???...To simulate a 90 degree swing move.
    A smaller screen should give you a shorter avg time.
     
  3. m0n4g3

    m0n4g3 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,741
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    Work computer - 316ms
    Home computer - 182ms
     
  4. PsychoSmiley

    PsychoSmiley Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2001
    Messages:
    7,119
    Location:
    Taranaki, New Zealand
    Similar experience. Tried it at work as I was trying to see what colleagues would get and I was pulling 360-390ms. Try at home and I'm getting 220ms.
     
  5. MulderAU

    MulderAU Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2011
    Messages:
    126
    You scored 248.0. You're currently in the top 53 percentile for this test!
     
  6. mtma

    mtma Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2009
    Messages:
    5,893
    It's javascript which your browser processes locally.
     
  7. na1lbomb

    na1lbomb Member

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2003
    Messages:
    217
    Location:
    Perth
    I averaged just over 300ms at work after multiple attempts, using a KVM and old dell 22".

    When at home I averaged just over 200ms on my first attempt with my gaming box and 165hz monitor. Would love to see the breakdown between display lag and input lag, but im betting works KVM was killing me.

    With 200ms I realised that my reaction time was not as bad as I thought, and that the reason I was getting owned in PUBG was more likely due to positioning and awareness.
     
  8. walker_2003

    walker_2003 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    13,284
    Location:
    Canberra
    205ms 94th percentile.

    best was 185ms I think.. I consider myself above average FPS gamer.. Age is 32, I dont get enough sleep.

    I rkn average would have been 180ms when I was in my gaming prime @ age 18

    The big factor for how well you will do in gaming is your aim not just reaction speed.
     
  9. Ratzz

    Ratzz Member

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2013
    Messages:
    10,412
    Location:
    Cheltenham East 3192
    Tried it once, on the basis that a cold test is more accurate? I got between 255 and 260 consistently, except for the last click which was 55 :shock: so an average of 217 :lol:.
    I'll have another shot later.
     
  10. FerrisXB9R

    FerrisXB9R Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2005
    Messages:
    3,255
    Location:
    AB, CAN
    Cold test:

    Lowest 183
    Avg 212

    Not bad for an old bastard.
     
  11. OP
    OP
    Bourke

    Bourke Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2017
    Messages:
    465
    Bought brand new mouse

    First try cold-290ms
    An improvement of 8ms.....giddy up
    Lowest was 242ms though...Maybe it's my big hands getting in the way of my success....:tongue::tongue::tongue:
     
  12. m0n4g3

    m0n4g3 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Messages:
    3,741
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    bump up polling rate to 1000hz. biggest improvement to input lag you will ever see.
     
  13. havabeer

    havabeer Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    Messages:
    6,712
    221 top 89 percentile.

    on a 4k, 60hz monitor
    wired mouse
     
  14. Franc

    Franc Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2003
    Messages:
    5,005
    Location:
    Melbourne North Sub
    240 ms lowest or 44ms when i clicked by accident at the right time lol
     
  15. Maelstrom

    Maelstrom Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2001
    Messages:
    1,626
    Location:
    Canberra
    "The default USB polling rate is 125 Hz, which means the mouse cursor can only be updated every 8 milliseconds."

    So ~4% of the average reaction time if you were to eliminate the delay entirely. Any reason why you think it's a huge improvement?
     
  16. mr camouflage

    mr camouflage Member

    Joined:
    May 25, 2012
    Messages:
    1,149
    Location:
    Perth
    Ave 245ms
    Fastest 141ms
    Second attempt.
     
  17. Kafoopsy

    Kafoopsy Member

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,760
    Location:
    Right Here!
    Average of 222ms, lowest was 180ms.
     
  18. Deano_20802

    Deano_20802 Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    439
    Location:
    Tas
    Just finished another 16hr shift, got 176ms on the first try and 187 average (have screenshots). I'll be keen to try in the morning (well later today) and when I'm in the zone next time I'm FPS gaming, although I doubt I'll see much difference. Looks ok to me looking at the average.
     
  19. NanoDuke

    NanoDuke Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2007
    Messages:
    7,728
    Location:
    Sydney
    212ms through my work's VDI box :/ dunno if I'd better it at home.
     
  20. Holdenkicks

    Holdenkicks Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2003
    Messages:
    961
    Location:
    Central Coast
    121ms best, avg 225ms - 2nd try, wireless mouse.
     

Share This Page

Advertisement: