Why are you so against people being sceptical? If this person is defrauding OCAU users, why do you expect us to just accept that it's okay? It is within his power to confirm this is in fact his cat, and the circumstances are factual. He tried once, and deleted the post when it was questioned. He hasn't provided a reason, and he hasn't provided the information required. So because he has chosen to not provide the evidence required, and actually created more questions, people are questioning his actions because it's not adding up. Why do you have an issue with people being held accountable?