MSI GTS 450 Cyclone review

Discussion in 'Video Cards & Monitors' started by booj, Oct 8, 2010.

Tags:
  1. booj

    booj Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Location:
    Adelaide
    Hey guys,

    Today i'll be taking a look at the newest card from the Nvidia stable,The GTS 450. I'll give an overview of the card and take it through it's paces in some benchmarks at stock and overclocked settings. The card is positioned as a competitor to the HD 57xx series from AMD. Since i don't have one of those cards on hand, i've chosen to compare it against the venerable previous generation card, the GTS 250 to give a reference.

    Introduction

    The GTS 450 is based on the Nvidia GF106 GPU, a derivative of the Fermi architecture. It is a 1.17 billion transistor chip built with TSMC's 40nm process. In it's reference configuration, it comes with 192 stream processors or 'Cuda Cores' in Nvidia parlance. It features a 783mhz core clock, 1566mhz shader clock and comes with 1gb of GDDR5 memory hooked up with a 128but bus clocked at 902mhz (3608mhz qddr.)

    The MSI N450GTS is an overclocked version, based on the reference PCB but featuring a significant 850mhz core clock, 1700mhz shader clock and memory clocked at 1ghz for a 4ghz effective clock. The most obvious difference is the addition of MSI's highly regarded Cyclone cooler, which promises better and quieter cooling than the reference design.

    More details and specifications can be found at the MSI website here

    Pics


    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  2. OP
    OP
    booj

    booj Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Location:
    Adelaide

    Test Setup


    The cards
    MSI N450GTS-1GD5/OC w/ Forceware 260.63
    MSI N250GTS-2D1G w/ Forceware 260.63
    Intel i7 980X @ 4ghz
    MSI Big Bang Xpower motherboard
    6gb G.Skill Trident 2000mhz C9 @ 1600mhz 7-8-7-20
    Thermaltake Toughpower 1200w
    Windows 7 32bit


    Benchmarks

    First up, a look at the load temperature of the card at default settings. At close to 7 minutes of stress testing the card is a very cool 45 degrees at 50% fan speed. Not bad at all.

    [​IMG]

    Since we're dealing with a mid range card, I've chosen a mainstream resolution to benchmark with which is common in the targeted market at 1680x1050. However some of the following results will show that higher resolution won't be a problem




    Crysis
    First up is Crysis. I have used the Assault Harbour test which features gunfire and explosions which should be more representative of general gameplay. Resolution is 1680x1050 at high settings in DX10 mode .

    GTS 250 Avg 31.05
    GTS 450 Avg 33.89
    GTS 450 OC Avg 38.89

    [​IMG]

    It's great to see a mainstream card delivering perfectly smooth fps levels at high settings in Crysis.


    Resident Evil 5
    Resident Evil 5 is another nice looking game that the 450 eats up at 1680x1050 resolution.

    GTS 250 Avg 73.0
    GTS 450 Avg 81.3
    GTS 450 OC Avg 89.9

    [​IMG]

    There's nothing to stop jumping to higher resolutions with those fps numbers.



    Far Cry 2



    GTS 250 avg 53.75
    GTS 450 avg 74.83
    GTS 450 OC avg 84.58 ​

    [​IMG]

    The 450 is miles ahead of the 250 in Far Cry 2. Once again increasing the resolution or turning on the AA/AF won't be a problem. Very impressive for a mainstream card at ultra high settings.



    Stalker: Call of Pripyat

    Stalker: Call of Pripyat is one of the few DX11 benches available. I love the apocalyptic atmosphere in this game. This one was run on the 450 only because of the lack of DX11 support on the 250.

    GTS 450 avg of 4 tests, 59.0, 62.7, 67.7, 33.1
    GTS 450 OC avg of 4 tests, 67.6, 71.2, 77.1, 37.7

    [​IMG]

    Another strong result. Stalker in DX11 mode with ultra high quality at 1680x1050 is a breeze.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2010
  3. OP
    OP
    booj

    booj Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Location:
    Adelaide


    3dmark 03


    GTS 250 46519
    GTS 450 43729
    GTS 450 OC 48455

    [​IMG]

    3dmark 03 is an odd one where the GTS 250 is still in front of the 450 at stock clocks. I'll put this down to a lack of optimization for 03 in the driver for the 450.



    3dmark 06


    GTS 250 17457
    GTS 450 18554
    GTS 450 OC 20633

    [​IMG]

    3dmark 06 shows the 450 more favorably.



    3dmark Vantage


    GTS250 8570
    GTS450 11473 stock
    GTS450 12977 OC​

    [​IMG]

    The 450 trounces the 250 in Vantage.​
     
  4. OP
    OP
    booj

    booj Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Location:
    Adelaide
    Conclusion


    A quick look on the bot puts the 450 3dmark results somewhere in between a HD 5750 and 5770, which is pretty reflective of it's pricing in the Australian market at least. I would expect 03 performance to improve with driver revisions.

    There's one thing we can be sure of: After it's incredibly long life and all the rebrands, the G92 core can finally be put out to pasture.

    Like the 460, the 450 has plenty of headroom for overclocking, even after a factory OC from MSI. Perhaps with some additional heatsinks on the memory and VRM sections, even better overclocking could be achieved. It's hard to complain with a close to 200mhz OC over the reference clocks though. It makes you wonder why Nvidia didn't release the card with a higher default clock to put more pressure on the 57xx series from ATI.
    It's hard to overlook how late the card is to market. If the 450 and for that matter the 460 were released a year ago, with a bit higher default clock then Nvidia could have been very competitive in the midrange.

    The addition of the cyclone cooler renders the card more or less silent, with the hard drive of the test system being the noisiest component when idling. With both the Cyclone cooler and Intel 980x cooler at 100%, the 980x cooler was much louder.

    For the time being though the card provides capable gaming at resolutions typical of the mainstream, If you're on a budget, looking for a quiet card that delivers on a price/performance ratio, then the GTS450 Cyclone is definitely worthy of consideration.

    Pro's
    Competitive price
    Excellent overclocking capability
    Low load temps and noise levels with the Cyclone cooler.
    The Afterburner utility
    Smooth gaming at high settings up to and beyond 1680x1050

    Con's
    Late to market
    No memory or vrm cooling

    Thanks to MSI Australia for the review sample.
    and thanks for reading guys.

    Cheers,
    Booj
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2010
  5. Dave2972

    Dave2972 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2007
    Messages:
    1,074
    Nice review.

    BUT.... since you used a 6 core CPU over-clocked to more than 4GHz with a budget video card, your results in 3D06 are pretty much useless as 3D06 is heavily CPU dependent.

    If you had a "budget box" computer to test it out in I feel your review would have been valid. Something like an i5 or an Athlon II powered box. I think that would have been a better match for that video card.

    Anyhow, kudos to you for taking the time to make and post your review. Your methodology was good even though you used a mismatched video card to your computer.
     
    Last edited: Oct 8, 2010
  6. porridge

    porridge New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2004
    Messages:
    890
    Location:
    Sydney
    The idea is to not have a CPU bottleneck.
     
  7. OP
    OP
    booj

    booj Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Location:
    Adelaide
    Thanks mate

    With this level of video card 06 is still quite gpu dependent, with gains from a gpu oc still being seen in the cpu limited tests, gt1, 2 and 4.

    As for the 980x, it's the only cpu I had free at the time :D
    And yes the idea is to show the gains from a GPU oc without having a cpu bottleneck. 4ghz isn't unrealistic for a lot of the guys here.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2010
  8. co.VAL(esce)

    co.VAL(esce) Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2009
    Messages:
    542
    Location:
    Sydney
    MSI always uses that same old cooler lolz.

    Would the GTS 450 overtake GTX 460's budget/performance king title?
     
  9. OP
    OP
    booj

    booj Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Location:
    Adelaide
    I guess it all comes down to what games you're playing and what monitor res you run. If you want to start cranking up the AA/AF then the extra bandwidth of the 460 will definitely help but it's hard to complain about the level of performance on offer for a <$150 card
     
  10. Smakked

    Smakked Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2007
    Messages:
    2,071
    Location:
    Goldcoast
    Nice review i nearly got a 450 but ended up with a 5770 which i am pretty happy with.
     
  11. moosi

    moosi Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    424
    Location:
    Sydney
    Anyone got any idea on how this card will fair against 8800GTs in SLI on a Q6600 @ 3ghz with 4gb of 1066mhz memory?
     
  12. OP
    OP
    booj

    booj Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    1,468
    Location:
    Adelaide
    I used a GTS 250 in the testing which besides the extra clock speed and a block of shaders is more or less the same as an 8800gt.

    I think in SLI the 8800gt's would still hold the edge in performance, give or take depending on the game and driver support but with the 450 you're getting DX11, better thermals, noise and much better power consumption levels.
     
  13. moosi

    moosi Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2007
    Messages:
    424
    Location:
    Sydney
    Yeh, downgrade screens is cheaper than buying new graphics cards each year. My solution to maintaining high frames
     

Share This Page