Discussion in 'Networking, Telephony & Internet' started by OzzieFarmBoy, Jul 4, 2017.
Yeah... that's what I meant to say.
you do realise that was a satellite connection, don't you?
fixed wireless will be better than that
sure, doesn't need to go up and down to a satellite 4 times.
fir direct comparison of the capability of the different technologies, see section 14.5 of http://www.nbnco.com.au/content/dam...atalogue-service-levels-schedule_20161205.pdf
look at the TC-1 and TC-2 frame delay figures to see what the network can actually deliver. if the traffic used is TC-4 then it's contended and thus frame delay is not within the control of NBN.
also, that's the performance of the NBN itself, any throughput test encompasses the link from the NBN to the access seeker, their network, their peering links to the cloud, any route to the data source, and the data source itself. you can't "see" the performance of the NBN itself without specialised testing because it's a layer 2 environment at the service level and thus transparent to layer 3 testing.
So I managed to get the cable (wire) run by a 3rd party. No cutting or drilling was required. Straight up through the wall cavity up to the roof peak and out from under the ridge cap.
All the NBN installer needed to do was tie their cable on and pull it through.
After all was said and done, I ran a speed test yesterday morning and needless to say, I was underwhelmed.
Plan: Fixed Wireless Silver (25/5)
Down: 4.15 Mb/s
Up: 0.12 Mb/s
Real world downloads have a 50MB test file from my ISPs CDN clocking in at about 350KB/s
Are you with Internode? Do you know how are others finding their service post-TPG ownership (e.g. are they skimping on purchasing CVC)?
Yeah I'm with Internode.
I don't know of anyone else locally that is with them.
100mbit FTTP here, hasn't been an issue.
Check with Inode support, doesn't sound right to me.
Most fixed wireless installs are usually close to advertised speeds, especially sub 50Mbs.