OCAU Ryzen Overclocking discussion/ Guide / Owners Thread

The 1600x looks like a good thing. Tempted.

 

ok i know this is more graphics card related.

but
https://www.techpowerup.com/download/unigine-superposition/

anyone else run it?

i did and pretty happy with the results.

http://bluetarot.com/images/screenshots/Superposition_Benchmark_v1.0_10360_1491987598.png

http://bluetarot.com/images/screenshots/Superposition_Benchmark_v1.0_3465_1491988368.png

http://bluetarot.com/images/screenshots/Superposition_Benchmark_v1.0_3466_1491989295.png

http://bluetarot.com/images/screenshots/Superposition_Benchmark_v1.0_20343_1491988600.png

http://bluetarot.com/images/screenshots/Superposition_Benchmark_v1.0_4696_1491987996.png



i looked at the 1070 and i think 4.3 5930 on guru3d and i am happy....one thing is though my 4k score is a lot better than my 1080p extreme score....go figure

 

Trying not to be tempted - I really don't need it, I don't need the hassle of selling my gear, I don't need faster performance than what I have.

But it's new and shiney!

 

Im about to have a ASUS PRIME B350M-A to sell

 

F5 bios installed on my gaming 5.

4x8gb 3200 c14 tridentz are

Now all running @ 3200 c14, with my 1800x @ 4.1 Ghz

Woot!

 

Dam that's a good result, congrats

 

Ye stoked!

Wasnt able to hit 4.1 with ny single 360 setuo. But once i qent to 2x360mm rads it auto boots to 4.1

So tried 1.38v for 4.1v and cinebench and realbench pass fine with the cou at 4.1 and mems 3200c14.

Honestly no difference in performance between this and my 5960x @ 4.5 system in games and everyday tasks.

 

1.38v is pretty dam good for 4.1, been reading most need more.

Are you able to do a 3dmark11 pass?

 

Very very nice man

I haven't gotten that far yet.

 

whats the chance of 4000+ ram running on Ryzen?

 

Decided to take a whole new approach, rather then buy a new motherboard for a possible 100-200mhz oc increase, going to ditch my rx480 and slap a gtx1080 in !

 

at t the moment no 4000+ memory doesn't mean it won't down the track for now though not a chance.
as for the 1080 yes i have seen a lot of the 1600x reviews and the 1080 seems to team up very well with it...makes no sense to me money wise but hey if you can ditch your card for say 250 and grab a 1080 for 500 then it makes a lot of sense

 

Installed the latest A.2 BIOS on my board a couple days ago and got around to playing with the RAM earlier, still stuck at 2400MHz, anything higher and it wont post .

The memory test option in the BIOS is useless as well, it doesn't reboot after a failed boot .

 

hye guys any news on mini itx mobos for am4 being stocked locally ?

 

As far as I know Biostar is the only company with an ITX, pretty sure you can only get them from the USA.

 

Very disappointed with my Asus x370-prime motherboard . Apparently it's incompatable with POE switches . I plug in the network card and it instantly kills my TP-link POE switch . I've googled it and I'm apparently not alone .The Asus Skylake ROG boards with " LanGuard" do exactly the same thing .

 

I think it made the right choice, ditched the rx480 for a gtx1080

www.3dmark.com/3dm11/12119677

 

http://rymem.vraith.com/

stumbled on that site some nice little database for ram... i loaded mine up but only comes up as ddr4 3600

 

I can nearly guarantee you would not be stable at those settings, bet you are popping L0 cache errors all over the place.

2 tests to prove it while running HWiNFO64 and monitoring the Hardware Error section;

1/ run RealBench stress test with 32GB ram selected for 30mins

2/ Prime 95 for Ryzen with custom size and memory to use at 30000 (monitor with task manager - performance - CPU - change graph to logical processors) and then watch cpu utilization....if you see any cpu's drop performance means it's dropping packages and not stable.

If you see any errors in HWiNFO64 monitoring section ie; L0 cashe errors it's not stable.

Have fun.

 

yea, hw errors. never seen them on intel oc's

back to its 24/7 oc @ 4.0 1.35V (no hw errors)

which is funny, at 4.1 no crashes, and would pass cinebench! (but hw errors)