Sony A9 Announced

Discussion in 'Photography & Video' started by Eradicate', Apr 20, 2017.

  1. Eradicate'

    Eradicate' Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,265
    Location:
    Adel
    • world’s first full-frame stacked CMOS sensor, 24.2 MP resolution
    • blackout-free continuous shooting at up to 20fps for up to 241 RAW/ 362 JPEG images
    • silent, vibration-free shooting at speeds up to 1/32,000 sec
    • 693 point focal plane phase detection AF points with 60 AF/AE tracking calculations per second
    • extensive professional features including Ethernet port for file transfer
    • dual SD card slots
    • BIONZ X Image Processor
    • blackout-Free Quad VGA 3.7m-Dot OLED EVF
    • 3.0" 1.44m-dot tilting touchscreen LCD
    • internal UHD 4K/30p video recording
    • Mag. alloy body
    • extended battery life
    • 5-axis in-body image stabilization with a 5.0 step shutter speed advantage
    • price: $4,499 / £4,500 (ouch!)
    • pre-orders to open on Friday (April 21st)
    • shipping starts in June, 2017

    https://www.dpreview.com/news/1308959313/the-sony-a9-is-a-24mp-sports-shooting-powerhouse

     
  2. lonewolf1983

    lonewolf1983 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    4,384
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    This certainly interests me, as both a sport shooter and someone who uses Sony Mirrorless.

    if it lives up to the specs, it will be a game changer (eventually)
    Why eventually?
    Well you need the glass to back it up, and Sony is lacking in native FE mount long primes... if the adapted glass works well (e.g. as good as canon/nikon does on their native bodies) then thats a boon.

    You do only get 10FPS with them but thats fine.

    Now the ergonomics probably wouldnt work for me (reserve judgement til i get one in hand), I really love the in hand feel of my Nikon stuff.

    I wont be jumping ship yet as i cant afford 2x bodies - which is how i like to operate, but down the track when prices drop and 2nd hand market gets better its something i'd seriously consider..... if the adapted glass works well.
     
  3. hippyhippy

    hippyhippy Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2004
    Messages:
    5,727
    Location:
    Sydney
    new battery only has 2.2 times more capacity which isnt really that good.
     
  4. kiwimeat

    kiwimeat Member

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2001
    Messages:
    1,926
    Location:
    Brisbane, QLD, Australia
    Australian Pricing confirmed.

    α9 Aussie Pricing
    SRP $6999
    Available from June 2nd

    100-400G SRP $3999.
    Availability date TBC.

    I am extremely interested in the lens but will likely wait for the technology to trickle down to the A7RIII.
     
  5. lonewolf1983

    lonewolf1983 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    4,384
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    Exxy but comparable or better to Canonikon
    The 100-400 will have a hard time against an adapted sigma offering

    Agreed on waiting through, something with 10fps, 50-100 raw buffer but rest the same would be good.
     
  6. csimpson

    csimpson Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2005
    Messages:
    7,643
    Location:
    Sydney
    I want the A9 so badly, it's so pretty. But $7K is oof. A lot of money. Sony tells me "tentatively available from July" for the 100-400 in Australia.
     
  7. dche5390

    dche5390 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2007
    Messages:
    3,431
    Location:
    Sydney
    Beautiful stuff. I wouldn't mind a bigger body TBH. EVF makes photography accessible to so many more people who wouldn't necessarily consider themselves as creatives. As much as it pains me to say this but sometimes, the best images and perspectives come from users who can't shoot in manual.

    I am looking forward to the next few years. Probably will never switch to the A9 myself. Yet.
     
  8. OP
    OP
    Eradicate'

    Eradicate' Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,265
    Location:
    Adel
    I expect it to be more closer to $6k or even under 6k once the price has settled.
     
  9. lonewolf1983

    lonewolf1983 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    4,384
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    i wouldnt, will be $6500+ from retailers at least for a while
    Gradual drop off then a big drop off when the next model comes seems to be the Sony pricing model

    In this case its still cheaper than the Nikon/Canon equivalents and the prosumers are not shy to spend the money at times
     
  10. OP
    OP
    Eradicate'

    Eradicate' Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2009
    Messages:
    1,265
    Location:
    Adel
    You could get preorder it right now from BH for under $6k, if you dont mind it being from the US.

    I'm slightly tempted, if it were 36mp+ i would have it on preorder already. Not sure i can stomach dropping back to 24mp after using a 36mp D800. Don't particularly need 20fps either.

    Sigma need to hurry up with their native E-Mount lenses, that would probably push me over the edge.
     
  11. lonewolf1983

    lonewolf1983 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    4,384
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    Plus the shipping and GST+import taxes (if you get caught), plus on such an expensive camera i'd want local support for warranty - and Sony Pro support if that floats your boat.

    I'm also slightly tempted, but cant fathom only shooting with a single body (no backup, and no second focal length), nor trying to sell my long fast glass for canon equivalents and hoping that adapted glass works properly.

    24mp is fine for sports/wildlife - but yes i can see why many would see it as a step down. Once you get used to 36/42mp files IQ its tough.
    I dont miss it when importing/editing though :lol:
     
  12. Xang

    Xang Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    891
    At least $6500 once you pay GST, whether you import or not.

    People who say '24MP too little' are missing the point, this camera isn't for them. There'll be a 40MP+ version in time, but it won't do 20FPS which is the point of this release.
     
  13. Amfibius

    Amfibius Member

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2002
    Messages:
    7,041
    Location:
    Melbourne, Victoria
    For me i'm a bit old school. I don't need, nor do I want so many megapixels. With more megapixels:

    - you get less overall ISO sensitivity
    - effective hand-holding shutter speed is less, meaning technique is more important
    - you are more likely to show up deficiencies in lenses
    - the files are larger, meaning CF cards and HDD's fill up faster. And post-processing takes longer.
    - if FPS is important to you, you get less FPS because the buffer fills up faster.

    I personally don't need anything more than 10MP. As long as they are 10 high quality MP. I could have bought an A7R2 for the same price as I paid for my A7S2, but I chose the A7S2 instead.

    I'll wait and see how well this new sensor rates.
     
  14. Xang

    Xang Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2007
    Messages:
    891
    I'm sure A9 users will be devastated after they shoot 241 consecutive RAW images and suddenly have to wait a moment for the buffer to clear.
     
  15. lonewolf1983

    lonewolf1983 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2002
    Messages:
    4,384
    Location:
    Perth, WA
    more an issue for me is that it appears you still get locked out of specific functions while it clears
    and the lack of a 2nd UHS-II slot means you're limited when shooting raw to both with clearing speed
     

Share This Page