Ther perfect monitor - finally! LG 38GL950G

Discussion in 'Video Cards & Monitors' started by cbwolf, Jan 12, 2019.

  1. ^catalyst

    ^catalyst Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    11,823
    Location:
    melbourne
    I'm with you 100%, even going from 1440 vertical to 1080 is very difficult.
     
  2. WRX_STi

    WRX_STi Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2001
    Messages:
    1,693
    Location:
    Cairns
    Gross ultrawide..
    I got VR for the vision when I need it. i'll stick to my 4k 40" 16:9
     
    power likes this.
  3. walker_2003

    walker_2003 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    10,639
    Location:
    Canberra
    For me heaven is:

    27"
    Microled
    144 or higher Hz
    2560x1440 (and a 3440 variant)
    HDR1000 (1000+ peak nits, infinite contrast ratio with microled, ultra high color gamut)
    G-Sync

    4k is really a joke for gaming on a 27/32 screen it's just not enough of a visual jump to half your performance. Some tests been done and alot of people can't even tell diff between 1440 and 4k on 27" mid game on a first person shooter.

    Give me higher fps any day.
     
  4. wintermute000

    wintermute000 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,594
    Isn't hdr1000 eyeball blasting pointless on monitor distances?
     
  5. walker_2003

    walker_2003 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    10,639
    Location:
    Canberra
    It's a peak and it's usually briefly and in small areas. If the artist wants you to squint they can make you. The picture as it was intended and the beauty of HDR.
     
  6. nope

    nope Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2012
    Messages:
    1,663
    Location:
    nsw meth coast
    cant wait to blow 2k i dont have on a wideboi that gets btfo by a 16:9 4k 120hz+ tv with dp1.5 and hdmi2.1+
     
  7. wintermute000

    wintermute000 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2011
    Messages:
    1,594
    LOL and yeah the TV probably costs half the monitor. Goddamned economies of scale
     
  8. walker_2003

    walker_2003 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2003
    Messages:
    10,639
    Location:
    Canberra
    And 55" (too big) and high input lag no thx
     
  9. Danthemanz

    Danthemanz Old School Admin

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2001
    Messages:
    2,436
    Location:
    Sydney
    Pretty dam nice.
    Ive got the 75hz Acer 38" and i find the size/resolution to be nearly perfect.
    While higher refresh would be nice, even 75 over 60 is a nice improvement.
    I dont think i play enough games to justify it though....
     
  10. ol-skool

    ol-skool Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    919
    I was going to go 38" but i wanted teh higher refresh rate and personally i dont like the ultra wides, so i ended up with an asus rog 32" 16:9, 1440p and i think it is perfect for gaming. Can run everything maxxed with 2080ti, games are butter smooth and now that gsync works with freesync/adaptive sync I can't complain.

    It's a nice monitor.
     
  11. raincloudx

    raincloudx Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2007
    Messages:
    1,095
    Location:
    Victoria
    This looks awesome. Any idea on release date?
     
  12. OP
    OP
    cbwolf

    cbwolf Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2001
    Messages:
    2,393
    Location:
    Melbourne
    32" @ 1440 is eye shatteringly low DPI :sick:
     
  13. varin

    varin Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2018
    Messages:
    10
    Location:
    Brisbane
    I assume you got the XG32VQ? Did you ever consider the PG279Q because of the IPS panel?

    Surely 93 PPI isn't that much lower than the 102 PPI on your 43" 4k monitor?
     
  14. OP
    OP
    cbwolf

    cbwolf Member

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2001
    Messages:
    2,393
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I used to have a 32" 2560x1440 monitor and the difference is surprisingly huge.

    Ideal is generally around 110 PPI (i.e. 2560x1440 on a 27" monitor or 4k on a 40" monitor).
     

Share This Page