Unigine Superposition

Discussion in 'Video Cards & Monitors' started by Agg, Apr 13, 2017.

  1. im late

    im late Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,630
    Location:
    Canning Vale WA 6155
    I can see CPU usage it up in the 40% in some bench runs of the 17 tests, therefore this is not a GPU specific benchmark..therefore IMO this is a pay to win benchmark..... :lol:

    But I think I am doing pretty well for the most pointless CPU ever made in the existence of silicon.... :D

    If under $2K I will drop $$$ on the new 18 core for shits and giggles....if they do +5GHz
     
  2. im late

    im late Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,630
    Location:
    Canning Vale WA 6155
    Running fans at 100% on air for benching and running under water ambient is not too different..
     
  3. im late

    im late Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,630
    Location:
    Canning Vale WA 6155
    Full disclosure, this was this afternoon's session:

    CORE - MEM - SCORE

    As you can see, efficiency matters.
     
  4. Azzan

    Azzan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,067
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Hmm but if mine was under water and temp were kept under 40C all the time then GPU should boost higher right?

    Not 100% but I think stock 9900K would beat stock 9980XE with same GPU in this benchmark, so I guess it's more of gaming benchmark.
    But it would be interesting to see Dannyboi's score cos his 7980XE can run 5GHz on all 18 cores..

    $2000 10980XE would be too much for me, but I might upgrade to $1000 10900X if it overclocks well. :)
     
  5. im late

    im late Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,630
    Location:
    Canning Vale WA 6155
    Likely yes, but efficiency (as I have explained) is the key here, not outright clocks.
     
  6. im late

    im late Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,630
    Location:
    Canning Vale WA 6155
    Well obviously I won't bother to compete with my 4 core as that is not fair.

    Wait till I got 18 core.
     
  7. Azzan

    Azzan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,067
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Not really, cos this is gaming benchmark.. and I think 4 core @ 5.3 > 16 core @ 5.0 on most games? 9900KS @ 5.3 should be able to beat 16 core @ 5.0 in this bench I think.
     
  8. im late

    im late Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,630
    Location:
    Canning Vale WA 6155
    for me the jury is out for this benchmark.

    I need to study the hwbot subs for this benchmark to discover the pattern..
     
  9. Azzan

    Azzan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,067
    Location:
    Melbourne
    I think we are suppose to run this bench @ 1080p Extreme(not 1080p Medium) for more accurate comparison.. but most people's been posting 1080p Medium result cos that's the default. (i.e. Unigine should really change default to 1080p Extreme)
     
  10. DarkSnipa

    DarkSnipa Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2017
    Messages:
    485
    Location:
    Perth
    I CBB to push my CPU as the one got is an OEM so I do not want to kill it by accident, my GPU is already maxed out but my card hits voltage limit too early before power limit comes to play so it is just me being unlucky despite the card is water cooled and voltage offset is maxed out as well.
     
  11. Dannyboi

    Dannyboi Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2018
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Mt Larcom
  12. Azzan

    Azzan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,067
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Ikr.. guess he didn't use bankai since he already got #1 score without it.
     
  13. im late

    im late Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,630
    Location:
    Canning Vale WA 6155
    Score update please. :)
     
  14. Azzan

    Azzan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,067
    Location:
    Melbourne
    OCAU Unigine Superposition Leaderboards (updated 07/11/19)

    1. 29475 - RTX2080Ti, 9900K, Azzan, p12
    2. 29458 - RTX2080Ti, 7640X, im late, p12
    3. 29300 - RTX2080Ti, 9980XE, Scum, p12
    4. 28971 - RTX2080Ti, 9900K, spit051261, p10
    5. 28577 - RTX2080Ti, 9900K, DarkSnipa, p10
    6. 27777 - RTX2080Ti, 8700K, walker_2003, p9
    7. 26803 - RTX2080Ti, 9900KF, sickbunny, p8
    8. 25308 - RTX2080Ti, 3700X, Plonkflopped, p10
    9. 25104 - RTX2080Ti, 3900X, Bolter01, p10
    10. 24401 - Titan X, 6700K, BelowAverageIQ, p4
    11. 23518 - GTX1080Ti, 7700K, cbwolf, p2
    12. 23393 - RTX2080S, 9900K, Azzan, p6
    13. 22544 - GTX1080Ti, 4790K, stoker, p1
    14. 22198 - RTX2080, 9700K, coathanger007, p11
    15. 22114 - Titan Xp, 5960X, aussie-revhead, p4
    16. 22023 - GTX1080Ti, 7700K, SneakyBastd, p4
    17. 21740 - GTX1080Ti, 6700K, c4dderly, p1
    18. 21447 - GTX1080Ti, 4770K, Bourke, p5
    19. 21104 - GTX1080Ti, 3900X, jpw007, p12
    20. 20811 - GTX1080Ti, 9900K, Jazper, p6
    21. 20280 - Titan X, 5960X, havabeer, p2
    22. 19049 - GTX1080Ti, 3770K, power, p3
    23. 18734 - GTX1080Ti, 5820K, coathanger007, 08
    24. 18276 - Titan X, 1700, Sipheren, p4
    25. 17901 - RTX2080Ti, 2600K, Bolter01, p6
    26. 16824 - GTX1080Ti, 4930K, HobartTas
    27. 16528 - GTX1080, 8700K, Azzan, p5
    28. 16458 - 5700XT, 2600, asho444, p6
    29. 16030 - GTX1080, 4770K, sw-m78, p2
    30. 15778 - Vega 64, 1950X, TaroT, p5
    31. 14561 - Radeon VII, 1700, Sipheren, p5
    32. 14423 - GTX1070Ti, 9900K, Azzan, p6
    33. 14102 - GTX1070, 4790K, sanjeevlives, p3
    34. 14067 - Vega 64, 3900X, Bertross, p6
    35. 14008 - GTX1070, 1700, darkbastard, p5
    36. 12850 - GTX1070, 1700, M4g3X0r, p4
    37. 10360 - Fury X, 1800X, TaroT, p1
    38. 9046 - R9 390X, 4930K, kEv_, p1
    39. 8977 - GTX1060, 9900K, Azzan, p6
    40. 8827 - R9 390X, 4790K, terroristone, p3
    41. 8388 - GTX1060, 8700K, Azzan, p4
    42. 8034 - RX580, 1600, Bolter01, p10
    43. 7969 - R9 290, G3260, kelthegeek, p7
    44. 5199 - RX570, 950, Skydome, p9
    45. 4955 - R9 380, 1600, Bolter01, p10
    46. 2647 - R7 360, G3260, kelthegeek, p2
    47. 976 - Intel UHD 630, 9900K, Azzan, p7
     
    im late likes this.
  15. Dannyboi

    Dannyboi Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2018
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Mt Larcom
    29604 - 1 x EVGA RTX 2080Ti Kingpin - 2175 / 8420 - i9-7980XE @ 5GHz - 32GB Team Xcal 4000 C14 - EVGA X299 Dark - Dannyboi - Water

    [​IMG]
     
    munchkin1, 5PH1NX and Azzan like this.
  16. Azzan

    Azzan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,067
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Nice score.. but 90+% overclock(base clock) on CPU is cheating.. ><
     
  17. Dannyboi

    Dannyboi Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2018
    Messages:
    22
    Location:
    Mt Larcom

    Haha. Yeah Intel hedt base clocks are ridiculously conservative it's not even worth looking at. :thumbup::thumbup:

    That's not just 5GHz but also pushing the cache and memory to the limit as well.
    That's why i laugh when people review new CPU's and brag on about how much faster this and that is over skylake X in particular.

    People make stupid statements like "everything from AMD atm smokes Intel" lol. Its just utter rubbish and ignorance of someone clueless to what these things can actually do.

    I think alot of people on here don't really understand how much computing power 5GHz on all 18 cores really is...
     
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2019
    5PH1NX and Azzan like this.
  18. Azzan

    Azzan Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2009
    Messages:
    2,067
    Location:
    Melbourne
    But AMD GPU & CPU are much better for games tho..
    [​IMG]
     
  19. spit051261

    spit051261 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2019
    Messages:
    240
    Location:
    Perth
    So why are you using Intel now and looking for another in the future if they are better for games?
    You could quite easily change your MOBO and get a thread ripper .
    There are also faster cards than AMD around .
     
  20. jpw007

    jpw007 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2008
    Messages:
    3,270
    Location:
    Melbourne
    That's a ~$3k CPU?

    Crazy results. Not comparable to the usual consumer/enthusiast amd v intel imo, but amazing stuff regardless. I'd love 5ghz on all cores phwoar.
     
    Dannyboi likes this.

Share This Page

Advertisement: