Unigine Superposition

I can see CPU usage it up in the 40% in some bench runs of the 17 tests, therefore this is not a GPU specific benchmark..therefore IMO this is a pay to win benchmark.....

But I think I am doing pretty well for the most pointless CPU ever made in the existence of silicon....

If under $2K I will drop $$$ on the new 18 core for shits and giggles....if they do +5GHz

 

Running fans at 100% on air for benching and running under water ambient is not too different..

 

Full disclosure, this was this afternoon's session:

CORE - MEM - SCORE

As you can see, efficiency matters.

 

Hmm but if mine was under water and temp were kept under 40C all the time then GPU should boost higher right?

Not 100% but I think stock 9900K would beat stock 9980XE with same GPU in this benchmark, so I guess it's more of gaming benchmark.
But it would be interesting to see Dannyboi's score cos his 7980XE can run 5GHz on all 18 cores..

$2000 10980XE would be too much for me, but I might upgrade to $1000 10900X if it overclocks well.

 

Likely yes, but efficiency (as I have explained) is the key here, not outright clocks.

 

Well obviously I won't bother to compete with my 4 core as that is not fair.

Wait till I got 18 core.

 

Not really, cos this is gaming benchmark.. and I think 4 core @ 5.3 > 16 core @ 5.0 on most games? 9900KS @ 5.3 should be able to beat 16 core @ 5.0 in this bench I think.

 

for me the jury is out for this benchmark.

I need to study the hwbot subs for this benchmark to discover the pattern..

 

I think we are suppose to run this bench @ 1080p Extreme(not 1080p Medium) for more accurate comparison.. but most people's been posting 1080p Medium result cos that's the default. (i.e. Unigine should really change default to 1080p Extreme)

 

I CBB to push my CPU as the one got is an OEM so I do not want to kill it by accident, my GPU is already maxed out but my card hits voltage limit too early before power limit comes to play so it is just me being unlucky despite the card is water cooled and voltage offset is maxed out as well.

 

Why only 4.5GHz? That's killing your score.

 

Ikr.. guess he didn't use bankai since he already got #1 score without it.

 

Score update please.

 

OCAU Unigine Superposition Leaderboards (updated 07/11/19)

1. 29475 - RTX2080Ti, 9900K, Azzan, p12
2. 29458 - RTX2080Ti, 7640X, im late, p12
3. 29300 - RTX2080Ti, 9980XE, Scum, p12
4. 28971 - RTX2080Ti, 9900K, spit051261, p10
5. 28577 - RTX2080Ti, 9900K, DarkSnipa, p10
6. 27777 - RTX2080Ti, 8700K, walker_2003, p9
7. 26803 - RTX2080Ti, 9900KF, sickbunny, p8
8. 25308 - RTX2080Ti, 3700X, Plonkflopped, p10
9. 25104 - RTX2080Ti, 3900X, Bolter01, p10
10. 24401 - Titan X, 6700K, BelowAverageIQ, p4
11. 23518 - GTX1080Ti, 7700K, cbwolf, p2
12. 23393 - RTX2080S, 9900K, Azzan, p6
13. 22544 - GTX1080Ti, 4790K, stoker, p1
14. 22198 - RTX2080, 9700K, coathanger007, p11
15. 22114 - Titan Xp, 5960X, aussie-revhead, p4
16. 22023 - GTX1080Ti, 7700K, SneakyBastd, p4
17. 21740 - GTX1080Ti, 6700K, c4dderly, p1
18. 21447 - GTX1080Ti, 4770K, Bourke, p5
19. 21104 - GTX1080Ti, 3900X, jpw007, p12
20. 20811 - GTX1080Ti, 9900K, Jazper, p6
21. 20280 - Titan X, 5960X, havabeer, p2
22. 19049 - GTX1080Ti, 3770K, power, p3
23. 18734 - GTX1080Ti, 5820K, coathanger007, 08
24. 18276 - Titan X, 1700, Sipheren, p4
25. 17901 - RTX2080Ti, 2600K, Bolter01, p6
26. 16824 - GTX1080Ti, 4930K, HobartTas
27. 16528 - GTX1080, 8700K, Azzan, p5
28. 16458 - 5700XT, 2600, asho444, p6
29. 16030 - GTX1080, 4770K, sw-m78, p2
30. 15778 - Vega 64, 1950X, TaroT, p5
31. 14561 - Radeon VII, 1700, Sipheren, p5
32. 14423 - GTX1070Ti, 9900K, Azzan, p6
33. 14102 - GTX1070, 4790K, sanjeevlives, p3
34. 14067 - Vega 64, 3900X, Bertross, p6
35. 14008 - GTX1070, 1700, darkbastard, p5
36. 12850 - GTX1070, 1700, M4g3X0r, p4
37. 10360 - Fury X, 1800X, TaroT, p1
38. 9046 - R9 390X, 4930K, kEv_, p1
39. 8977 - GTX1060, 9900K, Azzan, p6
40. 8827 - R9 390X, 4790K, terroristone, p3
41. 8388 - GTX1060, 8700K, Azzan, p4
42. 8034 - RX580, 1600, Bolter01, p10
43. 7969 - R9 290, G3260, kelthegeek, p7
44. 5199 - RX570, 950, Skydome, p9
45. 4955 - R9 380, 1600, Bolter01, p10
46. 2647 - R7 360, G3260, kelthegeek, p2
47. 976 - Intel UHD 630, 9900K, Azzan, p7

 

29604 - 1 x EVGA RTX 2080Ti Kingpin - 2175 / 8420 - i9-7980XE @ 5GHz - 32GB Team Xcal 4000 C14 - EVGA X299 Dark - Dannyboi - Water

 

Nice score.. but 90+% overclock(base clock) on CPU is cheating.. ><

 

Haha. Yeah Intel hedt base clocks are ridiculously conservative it's not even worth looking at.

That's not just 5GHz but also pushing the cache and memory to the limit as well.
That's why i laugh when people review new CPU's and brag on about how much faster this and that is over skylake X in particular.

People make stupid statements like "everything from AMD atm smokes Intel" lol. Its just utter rubbish and ignorance of someone clueless to what these things can actually do.

I think alot of people on here don't really understand how much computing power 5GHz on all 18 cores really is...

 

But AMD GPU & CPU are much better for games tho..

Spoiler

 

So why are you using Intel now and looking for another in the future if they are better for games?
You could quite easily change your MOBO and get a thread ripper .
There are also faster cards than AMD around .

 

That's a ~$3k CPU?

Crazy results. Not comparable to the usual consumer/enthusiast amd v intel imo, but amazing stuff regardless. I'd love 5ghz on all cores phwoar.