Just set up my new monitor which is tiny and had trouble getting other windows to show. Luckily I had the software for my AOC 35" which had software for splitting the screen. Installed it and it works a treat . Now it's just a case of setting up a split screen and I can use 2 windows on my 24" monitor.
It's not that bad lol Not as good as my 3 x 27" (144Hz) or my 35" (120Hz) but I can't really use them all together . I would need a 19 foot long table and 18 GPU's strapped together just to drive them After using 240Hz , or couldn't go back to using anything else TBH.
Yes but it doesn't work as well as the AOC software . Just set it initially and forget about it. No need to press anything then .
The split screen is not that bad. BTW I just ran a speed test for wired and wireless connection because I want the fastest for gaming and I never realized wireless was so slow . I will be sticking with the Ethernet cable for now .
No need really . Just leave it plugged in. Thew laptop uses wireless but that is fast enough for that.
I have decided I need another monitor to go with this one . I like 2 monitors but not sure what to get . Will probably have to get the same speed or they might default to the slowest one. Maybe a samsung 27" 240Hz but not sure . I will be able to open my own monitor shop soon
lol I'd just keep 24" Asus XG248Q(240Hz) & 35" AOC AGON AG352UCG6(120Hz) and be happy with em(that's nice combo imo).. especially since you just upgraded from 3x 27" Samsung CFG73(144Hz) only after couple of days.. But if you have money to burn then replace 35" AOC with: 27" Asus PG27UQ(4K, 144Hz) - ~$3200 or 35" Asus PG35VQ(UW 1440p, 200Hz) - ~$3600 and I'll buy your 35" AOC for half RRP.
I have decided that this monitor is too small and I want a different one. I will probably get this one , any comments ? Am I making another mistake ? Acer Predator XB273KP UHD 120Hz G-Sync IPS 27in Monitor I think this one looks good If anyone wants my small monitor for 450 , it's yours and only a few days old
lol wtf? I thought you were in love with 24" 240" monitor just couple of days ago.. geez.. I think you should just keep 24" Asus 240Hz and 35" AOC 120Hz.. but if you are def selling then I'd be interested in 24" 240Hz.
Wireless has always been slow compared to ethernet, and it gets exponentially worse the further you move from the base station... but then remember that for most people until recently DSL only managed a maximum of 24 Mbit making your WiFi faster than the internet anyway (even more headroom for those like me who were stuck on 4Mbit connections). NBN (or cable) has made WiFi more important, it's also part of the reason we are seeing mesh networks and other boosters in the mainstream as people need better wifi across their houses. On a side note, for gaming, it's all about ping, not raw speed. WiFi usually carries more latency than an ethernet connection making cable the better choice, but the loss in maximum speed (at those speeds anyway) aren't likely to have any impact in anything but downloading the updates. I'd also question that without a little counter showing ping in the corner of your screen most people wouldn't notice the difference between WiFi and ethernet in a blind test... especially in your case with both tests showing only 4ms.
4k on a 27" monitor you already know where you're going to end up, just by the $7000, 4k, 120hz, 50", G-sync, BFG monitors and just be done with it.
24" isn't small, it's pretty much the standard atm. anything else is seen as large and peoples brains melt at 32".
Dual 24" at work is pretty much the standard in our office now, the exception being people with older dual 22" setups. 27" is slowing becoming the norm too as 1920 x 1080 27" models are barely (if at all) more expensive than 24" models. At home I'm currently running 2 x 24.5" panels, perfect for my office based tasks (and dirt cheap).
