Z390chipset, i9 9900k i79700k and i5

Discussion in 'Intel x86 CPUs and chipsets' started by kot0005, Jun 28, 2018.

  1. macktheknife

    macktheknife Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,899
    I could get ice down at the railway station, I can't get a 9900k there.
     
  2. self_slaughter

    self_slaughter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2010
    Messages:
    1,743
    Didn't think there was a gene z370 to compare to?

    I was comparing the price to the Apex, as it looks like a mini apex and was thinking of downsizing...but +$200 just seems a little extreme.

    Anyways, I'm off to the railway station.... ;)
     
    OJR likes this.
  3. OJR

    OJR Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Melbourne
    In his latest video, der8auer says for serious overclocking you want the gene for it's 2 RAM slots and power phases. Seems like this board is a mini Apex. I'd be all over it if I didn't need 4 RAM slots.
     
  4. Inconceivable

    Inconceivable New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2018
    Messages:
    43
    I rang up PLE and the guy said "Early next year" for the 9900k

    So I had a look at my bank balance and some gaming benchmarks and reviews, the 9700k overclocks just as well, seems to have slightly better thermals for whatever reason I don't know, and costs $300 less for the same performance in gaming. Lack of hyperthreading and 4MB extra cache missing won't kill me. So I found a place that had one(1) 9700k and bought it on the spot. When they confirm it shipped I will cancel my pre/back-order with PLE.
     
    Dominic Redigolo and im late like this.
  5. im late

    im late Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,793
    Location:
    Canning Vale WA 6155
    No it won't kill, you, I bet you will be able to report back months from now and state the 9700K has not bottle-necked your needs in any way..do correct if I am proven to be wrong, but I would say for what most people use it for here, it will do the job extremely well, some will even agree overkill..
     
    Last edited: Oct 29, 2018
    Inconceivable likes this.
  6. Inconceivable

    Inconceivable New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2018
    Messages:
    43
    $300 for hyperthreading and 4MB of additional cache... the HT won't make a difference in gaming (the CPU has 8 physical cores anyway so HT is not going to come into play much at all I think). The system cache will make it a bit slower, but OTOH I have a feeling I will make that back by a cooler overclock than I could probably get on a 9900k.

    On a slightly related tangent, has anyone tried using graphite thermal pads instead of thermal paste? I've seen a few reviews on the internet and they tend to be favorable.
     
  7. im late

    im late Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    1,793
    Location:
    Canning Vale WA 6155
    If your main use case is for gaming, then I hazard a guess having (quoted above) will make a bees-dick of an FPS difference for all modern gaming titles.

    Maybe a few frames?? who cares??
     
    Inconceivable likes this.
  8. OJR

    OJR Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Errr you've answered your own question.
     
  9. WabbitHuntn

    WabbitHuntn Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    193
    Location:
    Murray Bridge, SA
    My 9900k is now with the courier.

    Delivery ETA Wednesday.
     
    Dominic Redigolo likes this.
  10. Externalz

    Externalz Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2007
    Messages:
    251
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Scorptec emailed me as i left work saying its ready to be picked up, so picked it up on the way through.

    Just got home, just a shame i don't have time to assemble tonight
    https://i.imgur.com/BryjT94.jpg
    [​IMG]
     
  11. shane41

    shane41 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2008
    Messages:
    7,130
    Location:
    dice que no sabe
    Agreed :thumbup: All reviews say these 6 cores are all you need for gaming. 8 core is no extra benefit yet ... so that's coding for it.
    My latest testing ... 8086K on x3 cores can easily benchmark a 780ti, perhaps x2 cores is enough. Meh I'm an overkill type of guy :leet:
     
  12. macktheknife

    macktheknife Member

    Joined:
    Jul 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,899
    I considered it but went with regular Grizzy Kryonaut because the thermal pads because they are apparently thermally conductive (so if something goes wrong it might short out a CPU/Mobo). Similar reason to why I didn't go liquid metal. It also didn't seem easy to get hold of in Australia, although it's supposedly just cut/rebadged Panasonic Soft-PGS, that still isn't simple to pick up instead of just buying Kryonaut or Arctic Silver or Mastergel or whatever other paste that is simple to get.

    For me if I end up for whatever reason Scorptec don't get the stock and I can't get the 9900k elsewhere until next year I'd "settle" for a 9700k in the next few weeks and either pocket the difference or use it on a R6 USB-C case.
     
    Inconceivable likes this.
  13. Inconceivable

    Inconceivable New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2018
    Messages:
    43
    Does hyperthreading really generate that much additional heat, though? If that's true, surely gamers would be disabling it on 6-8 core CPUs just to get better overclocks which should result in better overall gaming performance, right?
     
  14. DarkSnipa

    DarkSnipa Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2017
    Messages:
    854
    Location:
    Perth
    I had both 8700K and 8600K and ran them with 1.3V, 8700K generated more heat than 8600K under stress tests. For gamer there is no doubt the new 9600K and 9700K from Intel will get job done nicely while AMD Ryzen 2600 series provide great value.
     
  15. WabbitHuntn

    WabbitHuntn Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    193
    Location:
    Murray Bridge, SA
    Hyperthreading does generate more heat and very few games atm use more than 6 cores. So if just for gaming I'd go 9600k. But if you are steaming, rendering or other really CPU intensive stuff and have the cash. 9900k all the way. If you don't have the money and want bang for buck AMD 2700.
     
  16. Inconceivable

    Inconceivable New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2018
    Messages:
    43
    Well I already bought and installed the motherboard, RAM etc so a bit late to change streams now! I do have the money, but the reality is, I don't think that the 9900k is doing anything for me for that extra $300 price tag. I've been looking at a few benchmarks and OC benchmarks and for most games the 9700k and the 9900k are neck-and-neck at 4K gaming anyway.
     
    macktheknife likes this.
  17. WabbitHuntn

    WabbitHuntn Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2006
    Messages:
    193
    Location:
    Murray Bridge, SA
    4K gaming the GPU is more important. 9600k would do just fine for now. If you want to future proof a bit. 9700k would do you fine. Most games do a little worse with hyperthreading.
     
    Inconceivable likes this.
  18. Azer1234

    Azer1234 Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2009
    Messages:
    289
    Sup, if i got a 9700k and wanted a (mild?) OC of 5ghz 24/7 on all cores what mobo would be a good choice without burning cash?

    I was thinking the ROG z390 strix or would it be better to get the gene? Would rather the cheaper one but if it makes a lot of difference with ocing then thats sumin i gotta weigh up.

    Only plan on runnin 16gb ram

    Cheers
     
  19. IzzyBlues

    IzzyBlues Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2012
    Messages:
    102
    Location:
    Sydney
    Can't wait to inject my 9900k and install my ice.
     
  20. OJR

    OJR Member

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2013
    Messages:
    5,661
    Location:
    Melbourne
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page

Advertisement: